ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% SGS 0-2 FCA · 61% HAM 1-2 EIN · 45% ROT 0-2 RBL · 62% SAS 0-2 LAZ · 62% CUA 0-2 GIR · 65% AIK 0-1 IFE · 48% CAL 1-0 EUR · 47% PIN 0-2 ELC · 58% SES 0-2 ESP · 61% CAS 0-2 ALM · 63% ATL 0-2 MIR · 58% CIU 0-1 RAY · 51% ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% SGS 0-2 FCA · 61% HAM 1-2 EIN · 45% ROT 0-2 RBL · 62% SAS 0-2 LAZ · 62% CUA 0-2 GIR · 65% AIK 0-1 IFE · 48% CAL 1-0 EUR · 47% PIN 0-2 ELC · 58% SES 0-2 ESP · 61% CAS 0-2 ALM · 63% ATL 0-2 MIR · 58% CIU 0-1 RAY · 51%
Eliteserien · Regular Season - 26 Nov 1, 2026 · 16:00 · UTC KFUM Arena, Oslo Not Started

KFUM Oslo
vs
Ham-Kam.

Quick answer

Who will win KFUM Oslo vs Ham-Kam?

10 of 10 AI models pick KFUM Oslo to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 2–1 at 52% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → KFUM Oslo form Ham-Kam form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (679 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward KFUM Oslo (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 52% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Eliteserien table Where KFUM Oslo and Ham-Kam stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

KFUM Oslo win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Ham-Kam win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
KFUM Oslo win
2–1
55%
KFUM Oslo’s unbeaten last five and home venue outweigh Ham-Kam’s poorer recent run. Both defenses have conceded heavily, supporting a competitive match with the hosts narrowly ahead.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
KFUM Oslo win
2–1
48%
KFUM's better recent form (WWWDD) and home venue favor them over a struggling Ham-Kam side on a losing skid, though both defenses are leaky.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
KFUM Oslo win
2–0
52%
KFUM Oslo are in strong form with an unbeaten five-match run, while Ham-Kam have struggled defensively with 51 conceded and four defeats in their last five.
04
Grok 4.6
KFUM Oslo win
1–0
48%
KFUM unbeaten last five (WWWDD) vs Ham-Kam’s LLWLL and 51 conceded. Modest home attack (30 goals) plus five clean sheets supports a tight 1-0, not a shootout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
KFUM Oslo win
2–1
46%
KFUM Oslo are unbeaten in five (WWWDD) at home, while Ham-Kam have lost four of five. Ham-Kam concede heavily away and KFUM's solid form supports a narrow home win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
KFUM Oslo win
1–0
48%
KFUM Oslo's strong recent form (WWWDD) and home edge contrast with Ham-Kam's poor run (LLWLL); low-scoring profile suits a narrow home win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
KFUM Oslo win
2–1
58%
KFUM Oslo's strong recent form (WWWDD) and home advantage offset Ham-Kam's inconsistent defense (51 conceded). H2H shows close games, but KFUM's momentum edges it.
08
Kimi K3
KFUM Oslo win
2–1
58%
KFUM's strong recent form (WWWDD) and home advantage at KFUM Arena outweigh Ham-Kam's poor away record (LLWLL) and defensive frailties (51 goals conceded), despite Ham-Kam's dominant 4-0 H2H win earlier this season.
09
GLM 5.3
KFUM Oslo win
1–0
52%
KFUM's WWWDD form and home venue edge out, while Ham-Kam's LLWLL slump and 51 goals conceded suggest a narrow, low-scoring home win despite the earlier 4-0 H2H loss.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
KFUM Oslo win
2–1
52%
KFUM's WWWDD form and home venue contrast Ham-Kam's LLWLL run and 51 goals conceded; H2H 4-0 to Ham-Kam was April, but KFUM's current edge justifies a narrow home win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–1
    6 models
  • 1–0
    3 models
  • 2–0
    1 model

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 1.90 / 3.60 / 3.70
KFUM Oslo Market 49% · AI 100%
Draw Market 26% · AI 0%
Ham-Kam Market 25% · AI 0%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Predicted lineups: KFUM Oslo vs Ham-Kam

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

KFUM Oslo

3-4-3 · XI v Kristiansund BK, 25 Oct
J. Isnes
10 B. Njie
10 Njie
22 B. Kristensen
22 Kristensen
11 O. Visted
11 Visted
16 J. Hjorth
16 Hjorth
9 M. Vinjor
9 Vinjor
19 E. Saunes
19 Saunes
14 H. Hoseth
14 Hoseth
2 D. Schneider
2 Schneider
5 F. Berglie
5 Berglie
13 B. Skaret
13 Skaret
1 E. Ødegaard
1 Ødegaard

Ham-Kam

5-3-2 · XI v Rosenborg, 24 Oct
T. Myhre
28 David Benjamin
28 Benjamin
17 A. Potur
17 Potur
26 P. Metcalfe
26 Metcalfe
14 L. Mares
14 Mares
11 M. Ofkir
11 Ofkir
5 A. Andresen
5 Andresen
3 E. Amundsen-Day
3 Amundsen-Day
23 F. Sjølstad
23 Sjølstad
2 M. Gjone
2 Gjone
22 S. Nilsen
22 Nilsen
12 M. Sandberg
12 Sandberg

Season data

Eliteserien numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

KFUM Oslo

3-4-3
W-D-L
8-6-10
Goals
30-39
Clean sheets
5
Failed to score
5
Best win run
3
Penalties
3/4
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Ham-Kam

5-3-2
W-D-L
7-5-12
Goals
33-51
Clean sheets
4
Failed to score
6
Best win run
2
Penalties
3/3
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · KFUM Oslo

  • B. Njie 7 G · 1 A · 18 apps

Key players · Ham-Kam

  • P. Metcalfe 1 G · 6 A · 20 apps

Top scorers · Eliteserien

  1. 1 P. Christiansen Viking 15
  2. 2 Amin Chiakha Rosenborg 15
  3. 3 A. Helmersen Bodo/Glimt 12
  4. 4 L. Alvheim Kristiansund BK 12
  5. 5 K. Lonebu Molde 12
Venue KFUM Arena, Oslo
New at KFUM Oslo P. Meliga (Valerenga), H. Røsten (Rosenborg), J. Gonstad (Ham-Kam)
New at Ham-Kam M. Ofkir (Valerenga), Duarte Moreira (Bryne), O. Mengshoel (Eidsvold)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors KFUM Oslo

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 52% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.70 vs 0.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

KFUM Oslo
#8 · 30 PTS · GD -9
Last 5
D D W W W
10 GF · 5 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Kristiansund BK 2-2 D
  • Tromso 1-1 D
  • Valerenga 2-1 W
  • Hønefoss 0-2 W
  • Sarpsborg 08 FF 1-3 W
Team news
A. Aleesami — Groin Injury D. Hickson — Injury B. Njie — Inactive M. Njie — Inactive E. Odegaard — Elbow Injury M. Sinyan — Injury B. Skaret — Injury M. Grodem — Illness T. Soras — Injury T. Haltvik — Injury H. Jenssen — Injury S. Sjokvist — Red Card
Ham-Kam
#12 · 26 PTS · GD -18
Last 5
L L W L W
8 GF · 10 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Rosenborg 0-3 L
  • Bodo/Glimt 0-2 L
  • Start 2-4 W
  • Tromso 3-2 L
  • Kjelsås 0-2 W
Team news
N. Alexandersson — Injury E. Amundsen-Day — Suspended O. Rye — Injury L. Mares — Groin Injury A. Ekeroth — Leg Injury H. Opsahl — Injury D. Benjamin — Injury M. Gjone — Red Card A. Potur — Heel Injury B. Isufi — Elbow Injury M. Johnsgard — Knee Injury A. Trondsen — Injury

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with KFUM Oslo, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Eliteserien games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

KFUM Oslo
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Ham-Kam
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.30 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.6 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When KFUM Oslo is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.30 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: KFUM Oslo win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on KFUM Oslo vs Ham-Kam in Eliteserien? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is KFUM Oslo win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win KFUM Oslo vs Ham-Kam, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.