ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 48% KON 1-2 GAL · 53% LEH 0-2 PAR · 63% NIC 1-2 REN · 48% BOD 1-2 VIK · 44% LYN 1-1 RAN · 40% ALS 1-2 AL- · 55% SVE 1-2 FSV · 45% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 61% VIL 2-1 ESP · 55% SHE 2-1 WRE · 47% LIL 2-1 LEN · 49% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66% ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 48% KON 1-2 GAL · 53% LEH 0-2 PAR · 63% NIC 1-2 REN · 48% BOD 1-2 VIK · 44% LYN 1-1 RAN · 40% ALS 1-2 AL- · 55% SVE 1-2 FSV · 45% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 61% VIL 2-1 ESP · 55% SHE 2-1 WRE · 47% LIL 2-1 LEN · 49% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66%
Jupiler Pro League · Regular Season - 10 Nov 8, 2026 · 18:15 · UTC Daio Wasabi Stayen, Sint-Truiden Not Started

St. Truiden
vs
Zulte Waregem.

Quick answer

Who will win St. Truiden vs Zulte Waregem?

10 of 10 AI models pick St. Truiden to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 2–1 at 48% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → St. Truiden form Zulte Waregem form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (751 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward St. Truiden (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 48% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Jupiler Pro League table Where St. Truiden and Zulte Waregem stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

St. Truiden win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Zulte Waregem win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
St. Truiden win
2–1
51%
St. Truiden’s stronger scoring record and home advantage outweigh identical poor recent form. Zulte Waregem’s five scoreless games suggest limited attacking reliability, though recent H2H wins for St. Truiden support only a modest confidence.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
St. Truiden win
2–1
42%
Both teams in poor form (LLLL) but St. Truiden score more at home; Baždar's goal tally and H2H dominance favor a tight home edge.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
St. Truiden win
2–1
48%
St. Truiden possess superior scoring power led by Baždar and strong recent head-to-head dominance over Zulte Waregem, who struggle for goals away from home.
04
Grok 4.7
St. Truiden win
2–1
48%
H2H and Stayen edge St. Truiden despite both on WLLLL runs. ST score more (17 vs 10); Waregem often blank. Open but modest home win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
St. Truiden win
2–1
48%
St. Truiden's attack has been more productive (17 goals) and they won the last H2H 3-2, but both sides are on poor form, making this a close, low-confidence home edge.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
St. Truiden win
1–0
38%
Zulte Waregem failed to score in 5 of 9 games; H2H at Stayen strongly favors St. Truiden. Both in poor form, but Baždar's goalscoring gives home edge in a tight affair.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
St. Truiden win
2–1
58%
St. Truiden's attack (17 goals) and home form outweigh Zulte's defensive frailties (12 conceded). Recent H2H favors St. Truiden.
08
Kimi K3
St. Truiden win
2–1
52%
St. Truiden dominate recent H2H (4 wins in 5) and their attack (17 goals) is more potent than Zulte's (10 goals, 5 blanks), though both sides arrive in poor form (L4).
09
GLM 5.3
St. Truiden win
2–1
52%
St. Truiden score freely (17 in 9) with Baždar and Merlen, and dominate this H2H at Stayen; Zulte failed to score in 5 of 9, but both arrive on WLLLL, so keep confidence modest.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
St. Truiden win
2–1
42%
Both sides are in poor form (WLLLL), but St. Truiden score more at home and won this fixture 3-2 in February; Zulte's blunt attack (10 goals, 5 blanks) keeps it close.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

9 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–1
    9 models
  • 1–0
    1 model
Team news

Predicted lineups: St. Truiden vs Zulte Waregem

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

St. Truiden

4-2-3-1 · XI v Club Brugge KV, 25 Oct
99 Shion Shinkawa
99 Shinkawa
10 Ilias Sebaoui
10 Sebaoui
9 Samed Baždar
9 Baždar
11 Nathanaël Mbuku
11 Mbuku
8 Abdoulaye Sissako
8 Sissako
18 Nelson Ishiwatari
18 Ishiwatari
23 Joedrick Pupe
23 Pupe
4 Kota Takai
4 Takai
5 Shogo Taniguchi
5 Taniguchi
3 Taiga Hata
3 Hata
16 Léo Kokubo
16 Kokubo

Zulte Waregem

4-3-3 · XI v RAAL La Louvière, 24 Oct
21 István Átrok
21 Átrok
18 Anosike Ementa
18 Ementa
22 Ousseynou Niang
22 Niang
11 Marley Aké
11 Aké
6 Enrique Lofolomo
6 Lofolomo
36 Serxho Ujka
36 Ujka
15 Youssoupha Mbodji
15 Mbodji
5 Jakob Kiilerich
5 Kiilerich
4 Laurent Lemoine
4 Lemoine
45 Benoit De Jaegere
45 Jaegere
13 Brent Gabriel
13 Gabriel

Season data

Jupiler Pro League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

St. Truiden

W-D-L
2-2-5
Goals
17-19
Clean sheets
1
Failed to score
3
Best win run
1
Penalties
1/1
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Zulte Waregem

4-3-3
W-D-L
3-2-4
Goals
10-12
Clean sheets
3
Failed to score
5
Best win run
1
Penalties
0/0
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · St. Truiden

  • R. Merlen 3 G · 4 A · 9 apps
  • I. Sebaoui 3 G · 3 A · 9 apps
  • S. Baždar 5 G · 0 A · 7 apps

Key players · Zulte Waregem

  • A. Ementa 1 G · 4 A · 9 apps
  • T. Hedl 2 G · 2 A · 9 apps

Top scorers · Jupiler Pro League

  1. 1 N. Bassette KVC Westerlo 7
  2. 2 N. Tresoldi Club Brugge KV 7
  3. 3 R. Durosinmi Genk 6
  4. 4 R. Florucz Union St. Gilloise 5
  5. 5 M. Ubandoma RAAL La Louvière 5
Venue Daio Wasabi Stayen, Sint-Truiden
New at St. Truiden N. Mbuku (FC Augsburg), Jeremy Kandje Mbambi (Pisa), K. Takai (Tottenham)
New at Zulte Waregem O. Niang (Union St. Gilloise), N. Horvat (Borussia Mönchengladbach), E. Mbodji (Slavia Praha)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors St. Truiden

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 48% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.90 vs 0.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric St. Truiden Zulte Waregem Expected total Lean
Corners 5.6 4.8 10.4 Under 10.5 53% Ask AI
Yellow cards 1.5 1.4 2.8 Over 2.5 54% Ask AI
Shots 14.5 12.8 27.3 Under 27.5 53% Ask AI
Shots on target 4.8 4.7 9.6 Under 9.5 51% Ask AI

Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

St. Truiden
#13 · 8 PTS · GD -2
Last 5
L W W W L
12 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Club Brugge KV 3-2 L
  • FC Midtjylland 0-1 W
  • Lommel United 4-1 W
  • FC Iberia 1999 2-0 W
  • KV Mechelen 4-3 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Zulte Waregem
#10 · 11 PTS · GD -2
Last 5
L W L L L
4 GF · 10 GA
Recent fixtures
  • RAAL La Louvière 3-0 L
  • Seraing United 3-0 W
  • Gent 0-2 L
  • Lille 2-1 L
  • Anderlecht 3-0 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

STT 5 · D 0 · ZUL 0

STT VS ZUL
3-2
HOME WIN
Feb 15, 2026
ZUL VS STT
0-2
AWAY WIN
Aug 23, 2025
STT VS ZUL
2-0
HOME WIN
Dec 27, 2022
ZUL VS STT
0-3
AWAY WIN
Sep 17, 2022
ZUL VS STT
0-2
AWAY WIN
Apr 2, 2022

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with St. Truiden, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Jupiler Pro League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

St. Truiden
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Zulte Waregem
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.80 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.1 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When St. Truiden is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.80 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: St. Truiden win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on St. Truiden vs Zulte Waregem in Jupiler Pro League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is St. Truiden win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win St. Truiden vs Zulte Waregem, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.