Ipswich
vs
Nottingham Forest.
Quick answer
Who will win Ipswich vs Nottingham Forest?
Final score: Ipswich 1–1 Nottingham Forest. Before kickoff, 9 of 12 AI models pick Ipswich to win (75%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–1.
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
12 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Ipswich (9 of 12 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 49% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
9 / 12 models
2 / 12 models
1 / 12 models
12 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
5 of 12 models settled on 2–1. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.
-
2–1
5 models
-
1–0
4 models
-
1–1
2 models
-
1–2
1 model
Live match centre
Full-timeMomentum, live stats, xG, player ratings and every event, minute by minute.
Unlock with Pro in the appBookmakers vs the AI panel
Bet365 · 3.20 / 3.40 / 2.25Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 12 AI models picking each result.
Confirmed lineups: Ipswich vs Nottingham Forest
Ipswich
G. O'Neil
Bench: Z. Flemming, C. Akpom, D. Maeda, J. Clarke, M. Núñez, A. Matusiwa, J. Greaves, D. Furlong, K. Scherpen
Nottingham Forest
O. Glasner
Bench: A. Kalimuendo, C. Wood, R. Yates, C. Hudson-Odoi, I. Sangaré, O. Aina, L. Netz, O. Diomande, John
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in Ipswich's and Nottingham Forest's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
Ipswich (at home)
W
L
L
W
W
D
W
D
D
W
|
Nottingham Forest (away)
L
W
D
L
L
W
W
W
D
L
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
50%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
40%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
| Drew |
30%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
20%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
| Over 1.5 goals |
90%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
100%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Over 2.5 goals |
60%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
100%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
| Over 3.5 goals |
20%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
70%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
| Both teams scored |
70%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
70%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Scored |
90%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
90%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Clean sheet |
20%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
20%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
| Over 9.5 corners |
44%
All games 22% (2/9)
|
44%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
56%
All games 44% (4/9)
|
78%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
Premier League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
Ipswich
4-2-3-1- W-D-L
- 3-1-4
- Goals
- 12-16
- Clean sheets
- 0
- Failed to score
- 2
- Best win run
- 1
- Penalties
- 1/1
Nottingham Forest
3-4-2-1- W-D-L
- 1-3-4
- Goals
- 6-10
- Clean sheets
- 1
- Failed to score
- 4
- Best win run
- 1
- Penalties
- 1/1
Key players · Ipswich
-
J. Enciso
1 G · 2 A · 8 apps
Key players · Nottingham Forest
- No player in the competition's top scorers or assisters.
Top scorers · Premier League
- 1 E. Haaland Manchester City 9
- 2 A. Isak Liverpool 6
- 3 João Pedro Chelsea 5
- 4 M. Tavernier Bournemouth 5
- 5 R. Cherki Manchester City 4
What’s moving the panel.
75% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 49% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Match stats forecast
Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.
| Metric | Ipswich | Nottingham Forest | Expected total | Lean | Actual | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 6.4 | 4.6 | 11.1 | Under 11.5 57% | 5 hit | Ask AI |
| Yellow cards | 1.5 | 1.8 | 3.3 | Under 3.5 58% | 2 hit | Ask AI |
| Shots | 14.1 | 11.0 | 25.1 | Under 25.5 54% | 24 hit | Ask AI |
| Shots on target | 4.9 | 4.6 | 9.5 | Under 9.5 52% | 8 hit | Ask AI |
Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.
Actual Draw · AI Ipswich win
Form, history, team news.
- Nottingham Forest 1-1 D
- Manchester City 3-2 L
- Fulham 2-1 W
- Everton 1-0 L
- Arsenal 2-4 L
S. Lukic — Groin Injury
J. Taylor — Knee Injury
- Ipswich 1-1 D
- Arsenal 0-1 L
- Crystal Palace 3-1 L
- Coventry 0-1 L
- Aston Villa 1-2 W
Igor Jesus — Calf Injury
N. Savona — Knee Injury
Last five meetings.
IPS 0 · D 1 · NOT 2
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 75% of models side with Ipswich, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 17% — tight Premier League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 2.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When Ipswich is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 2.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Ipswich win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on Ipswich vs Nottingham Forest in Premier League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Ipswich win, with vote shares roughly 75% / 17% / 8% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win Ipswich vs Nottingham Forest, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
Related matches
- Aston Villa vs Manchester City Premier League
- Arsenal vs Everton Premier League
- Coventry vs Fulham Premier League
- Chelsea vs Tottenham Premier League
- Crystal Palace vs Newcastle Premier League
- Hull City vs Brentford Premier League
- Liverpool vs Brighton Premier League
- Manchester United vs Bournemouth Premier League
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Nottingham Forest vs Arsenal prediction: AI panel consensus for Premier League clash, with 90% backing Arsenal and a most common score of 0-1.
Manchester City vs Ipswich prediction: our AI panel unanimously backs City in the Premier League, with a 4-0 scoreline and 73% average confidence.
Vegas Golden Knights vs New Jersey Devils prediction: the AI panel unanimously backs Vegas in this NHL clash, with a 3-2 scoreline and 58% confidence.
Levante vs Atletico Madrid prediction for their La Liga clash. The AI panel unanimously backs an Atletico win, with a clean sheet the most likely outcome.
Read our Chelsea vs Manchester United prediction for the Premier League clash at Stamford Bridge. The AI panel unanimously backs a narrow home win.
Gremio vs Atletico Paranaense prediction for the Serie A clash, with the AI panel's consensus, most common score and a clear winner at Arena do Grêmio.
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.