FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% SPO 1-2 FCD · 60% ST. 2-1 SAN · 49% ACM 1-1 INT · 42% EST 0-1 LEM · 44% AND 1-2 KVC · 43% SKB 0-2 UNI · 62% BAR 3-0 ALA · 64% AST 1-0 FUL · 46% DEP 0-0 TAL · 37%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 33 Shell Energy Stadium, Houston Not Started

Houston Dynamo
vs
St. Louis City.

Quick answer

Who will win Houston Dynamo vs St. Louis City?

4 of 10 AI models pick St. Louis City to win (40%). A draw is in play: 5 of 10 models picked it. The mean predicted score is 1–1 at 43% average confidence (low).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Houston Dynamo form St. Louis City form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward the draw (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–1 at 43% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Major League Soccer table Where Houston Dynamo and St. Louis City stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Houston Dynamo win 10%

1 / 10 models

Draw 50%

5 / 10 models

St. Louis City win 40%

4 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Draw
1–1
27%
Houston’s home advantage and four-match unbeaten run balance St. Louis City’s stronger scoring record and superior season results. Recent meetings are competitive, so a cautious 1-1 draw is the best exact-score estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
St. Louis City win
1–2
44%
St. Louis has better overall record and attack, though Houston struggling (LDDDD); recent H2H trend favors St. Louis, both sides concede freely.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
1–1
48%
Houston have drawn four of their last five matches with solid defense, while St. Louis brings strong scoring power led by Navarro, pointing toward a balanced, tight encounter.
04
Grok 4.7
Draw
1–1
48%
Houston’s LDDDD run shows they rarely win but keep games tight at home; St. Louis attack is stronger yet lost last two, so a low 1-1 fits both sides’ recent scoring.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
St. Louis City win
1–2
42%
St. Louis has more wins and goals this season, while Houston is winless in five. H2H also favors St. Louis recently, though Houston's home edge keeps it close.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Draw
1–1
48%
Houston's poor form (LDDDD) limits winning chances, but home defensive solidity (12 clean sheets) and St. Louis's leaky defense (44 conceded) support a low-scoring draw.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Houston Dynamo win
1–0
51%
Houston unbeaten in five with 13 clean sheets at Shell Energy Stadium; St. Louis on three straight losses and leaky despite scoring more.
08
Kimi K3
Draw
1–1
32%
Houston have drawn four straight and St. Louis arrive off two losses; both attacks score regularly (Navarro 18, Guilherme 16) and H2H meetings usually produce goals, so a score draw at Shell Energy Stadium fits best.
09
GLM 5.3
St. Louis City win
2–3
48%
Houston winless in five (LDDDD) at home, while St. Louis's stronger attack (56 goals, Navarro 18) and recent H2H edge offset their own two losses. Modest away lean in an open game.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
St. Louis City win
1–2
42%
St. Louis outscored Houston 56-44 and won the last H2H; Houston's five-game LDDDD run and nine blanks suggest a narrow home loss despite venue.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 1–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–1
    5 models
  • 1–2
    3 models
  • 1–0
    1 model
  • 2–3
    1 model
Team news

Predicted lineups: Houston Dynamo vs St. Louis City

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

Houston Dynamo

4-2-3-1 · XI v Seattle Sounders, 29 Oct
Ben Olsen
9 L. Foster
9 Foster
24 A. Ibrahim
24 Ibrahim
30 A. Bouzat
30 Bouzat
19 M. Bogusz
19 Bogusz
18 D. Samassékou
18 Samassékou
6 Artur
6 Artur
21 F. Negri
21 Negri
34 A. Resch
34 Resch
5 Lucas Halter
5 Halter
11 L. Ennali
11 Ennali
31 J. Bond
31 Bond

St. Louis City

3-4-3 · XI v Portland Timbers, 29 Oct
Y. Damet
42 D. Downs
42 Downs
9 Rafael Navarro
9 Navarro
19 C. Holse
19 Holse
14 T. Totland
14 Totland
24 D. Edelman
24 Edelman
8 C. Durkin
8 Durkin
6 C. Wallem
6 Wallem
21 D. Polvara
21 Polvara
5 L. MacNaughton
5 MacNaughton
32 T. Baumgartl
32 Baumgartl
39 B. Lundt
39 Lundt

Season data

Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Houston Dynamo

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
14-9-9
Goals
42-39
Clean sheets
13
Failed to score
9
Best win run
5
Penalties
3/3
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

St. Louis City

3-4-3
W-D-L
14-9-9
Goals
58-47
Clean sheets
5
Failed to score
6
Best win run
4
Penalties
3/3
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Houston Dynamo

  • Guilherme 16 G · 8 A · 30 apps

Key players · St. Louis City

  • Rafael Navarro 19 G · 6 A · 32 apps

Top scorers · Major League Soccer

  1. 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 25
  2. 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
  3. 3 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
  4. 4 M. Iloski Philadelphia Union 19
  5. 5 D. Bouanga Los Angeles FC 18
Venue Shell Energy Stadium, Houston
New at Houston Dynamo L. Foster (Burnley), M. Saracchi (Boca Juniors), D. McGuire (Orlando City SC)
New at St. Louis City D. Downs (Southampton), C. Brunet (Nashville SC), Rafael Navarro (Colorado Rapids)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Models lean the draw

50% of models take a stalemate — cross-check score frequency and 1X2 strip before sizing.

02
Low confidence

Mean 43% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.10 vs 1.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric Houston Dynamo St. Louis City Expected total Lean
Corners 5.0 4.3 9.3 Under 9.5 55% Ask AI
Yellow cards 2.2 1.5 3.8 Over 3.5 52% Ask AI
Shots 13.1 12.6 25.7 Over 25.5 50% Ask AI
Shots on target 3.9 5.2 9.0 Under 9.5 58% Ask AI

Sample: 3 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 285 graded matches, cards 59% of 286. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Houston Dynamo
#4 · 51 PTS · GD +3
Last 5
W D D D D
8 GF · 7 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Seattle Sounders 0-1 W
  • Minnesota United FC 0-0 D
  • FC Dallas 2-2 D
  • San Diego 3-3 D
  • Minnesota United FC 2-2 D
Team news
Artur — Knee Injury R. Miller — Lower-Body Injury N. Quinones — Lower-Body Injury Felipe Andrade — Thigh Injury Antonio Carlos — Red Card A. Bouzat — Red Card Lucas Halter — Lower-Body Injury N. Markanich — Red Card E. Sviatchenko — Red Card J. McGlynn — Lower-Body Injury O. Lingr — Red Card J. Maurer — Concussion
St. Louis City
#3 · 51 PTS · GD +11
Last 5
L L D L D
4 GF · 9 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Portland Timbers 2-3 L
  • Real Salt Lake 3-0 L
  • Columbus Crew 0-0 D
  • Minnesota United FC 3-2 L
  • Vancouver Whitecaps 0-0 D
Team news
F. Fall — Leg Injury E. Lowen — Personal Reasons T. Ostrak — Leg Injury T. Pearce — Inactive T. Totland — Injury C. Teuchert — Ankle Injury Celio Pompeu — Knee Injury J. Orozco — Concussion S. Jeong — Injury C. Glover — Injury M. Mbacke — Back Injury C. Durkin — Red Card

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 10% of models side with Houston Dynamo, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 50% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Houston Dynamo
~10%
implied lean
Draw
~50%
implied lean
St. Louis City
~40%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.50 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.8 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Houston Dynamo is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.50 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: St. Louis City win. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Houston Dynamo vs St. Louis City in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is St. Louis City win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 50% / 40% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Houston Dynamo vs St. Louis City, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.