UDI 0-2 ASR · 62% CHA 2-2 ORL · 42% AAL 1-1 SAN · 43% STA 2-0 KOR · 58% TOT 1-0 CRY · 47% REA 2-0 MAL · 63% BAY 2-1 BOR · 53% HEE 2-1 NEC · 51% PSV 3-0 WIL · 68% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42% UDI 0-2 ASR · 62% CHA 2-2 ORL · 42% AAL 1-1 SAN · 43% STA 2-0 KOR · 58% TOT 1-0 CRY · 47% REA 2-0 MAL · 63% BAY 2-1 BOR · 53% HEE 2-1 NEC · 51% PSV 3-0 WIL · 68% FCC 1-2 PHI · 50% COL 2-1 DCU · 54% NEW 1-0 CFM · 47% AL- 3-0 AL- · 65% COR 1-1 VIT · 42%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 33 TQL Stadium, Cincinnati Not Started

FC Cincinnati
vs
Nashville SC.

Quick answer

Who will win FC Cincinnati vs Nashville SC?

10 of 10 AI models pick Nashville SC to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 1–2 at 54% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → FC Cincinnati form Nashville SC form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (799 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Nashville SC (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 54% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Major League Soccer table Where FC Cincinnati and Nashville SC stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

FC Cincinnati win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Nashville SC win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Nashville SC win
1–2
62%
Nashville’s 21-3-7 record, 23 goals conceded and 15 clean sheets are substantially stronger than Cincinnati’s defensive profile. Cincinnati’s home advantage and potent scorers should keep this close, but Nashville’s recent 4-0 win supports a narrow away victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Nashville SC win
1–2
47%
Nashville's elite defensive record (15 clean sheets, 23 conceded) and dominant form outweigh Cincinnati's home edge; recent H2H also favors Nashville.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Nashville SC win
1–2
58%
Nashville boasts an elite record with only 23 goals conceded and a potent attack led by Mukhtar and Surridge, making them likely to overcome Cincinnati's leaky backline.
04
Grok 4.7
Nashville SC win
1–2
42%
Nashville's elite 21-7-3 record and 15 clean sheets dwarf Cincinnati's leaky 71 conceded; Mukhtar/Surridge travel well, though Denkey can nick one at TQL.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Nashville SC win
1–2
58%
Nashville's 21W-7D-3L record, 15 clean sheets, and 4-0 H2H win signal clear superiority. Cincinnati's leaky defense (71 conceded) and Nashville's Surridge/Mukhtar form make an away win likely.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Nashville SC win
0–2
40%
Nashville's elite defense (15 clean sheets, 23 conceded) and dominant form (WWWDW) plus recent 4-0 H2H suggest they control this; Cincinnati's negative GD and leaky backline make a clean sheet unlikely.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Nashville SC win
0–2
64%
Nashville 21W with 16 clean sheets and 23 conceded vs Cincinnati leaking 73; recent 4-0 H2H win supports away control.
08
Kimi K3
Nashville SC win
1–2
58%
Nashville's superior form (21W-7D-3L) and defensive record (15 clean sheets) outweigh Cincinnati's home advantage, especially after their recent 4-0 H2H victory.
09
GLM 5.3
Nashville SC win
1–2
58%
Nashville's 21W-3L record, 15 clean sheets and recent 4-0 win over Cincinnati outweigh home venue; Cincinnati's Denkey and Evander can grab one, but Surridge and Mukhtar edge a 1-2.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Nashville SC win
0–2
52%
Nashville's 21W-3L season, 15 clean sheets and 23 goals conceded far outclass Cincinnati's 11-9-11 record; recent 4-0 H2H and strong form support an away win despite TQL Stadium venue.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

7 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–2
    7 models
  • 0–2
    3 models
Team news

Predicted lineups: FC Cincinnati vs Nashville SC

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

FC Cincinnati

3-5-2 · XI v Inter Miami, 28 Oct
Pat Noonan
9 K. Denkey
9 Denkey
17 K. Mboma Dem
17 Dem
29 Bryan Josías Ramírez León
29 León
5 O. Nwobodo
5 Nwobodo
10 Evander
10 Evander
22 G. Valenzuela
22 Valenzuela
23 D. Douděra
23 Douděra
15 T. Hadebe
15 Hadebe
4 N. Hagglund
4 Hagglund
11 S. Gidi
11 Gidi
18 R. Celentano
18 Celentano

Nashville SC

4-3-3 · XI v Philadelphia Union, 29 Oct
B. Callaghan
37 A. Qasem
37 Qasem
41 W. Madrigal
41 Madrigal
7 C. Espinoza
7 Espinoza
20 E. Tagseth
20 Tagseth
8 P. Yazbek
8 Yazbek
19 A. Muyl
19 Muyl
2 D. Lovitz
2 Lovitz
3 M. Woledzi
3 Woledzi
4 J. Palacios
4 Palacios
27 R. Baker-Whiting
27 Baker-Whiting
99 B. Schwake
99 Schwake

Season data

Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

FC Cincinnati

3-5-2
W-D-L
11-10-11
Goals
66-73
Clean sheets
3
Failed to score
5
Best win run
2
Penalties
6/6
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Nashville SC

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
21-8-3
Goals
66-23
Clean sheets
16
Failed to score
6
Best win run
5
Penalties
4/4
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · FC Cincinnati

  • Evander 13 G · 11 A · 29 apps
  • K. Denkey 17 G · 3 A · 30 apps

Key players · Nashville SC

  • H. Mukhtar 16 G · 7 A · 32 apps
  • S. Surridge 18 G · 1 A · 26 apps
  • C. Espinoza 4 G · 12 A · 28 apps

Top scorers · Major League Soccer

  1. 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 25
  2. 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
  3. 3 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
  4. 4 M. Iloski Philadelphia Union 19
  5. 5 D. Bouanga Los Angeles FC 18
Venue TQL Stadium, Cincinnati
New at FC Cincinnati T. Malacia (Manchester United), J. Malatini (Werder Bremen), D. Douděra (Slavia Praha)
New at Nashville SC Owen Presthus (Columbus Crew), F. Camara (Ranheim), Z. Yañez (New York City FC)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Nashville SC

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 54% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 0.70 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric FC Cincinnati Nashville SC Expected total Lean
Corners 5.7 4.4 10.1 Under 10.5 57% Ask AI
Yellow cards 2.0 1.7 3.6 Under 3.5 51% Ask AI
Shots 16.3 13.4 29.8 Over 29.5 51% Ask AI
Shots on target 6.0 5.6 11.6 Over 11.5 50% Ask AI

Sample: 3 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 285 graded matches, cards 59% of 286. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

FC Cincinnati
#8 · 43 PTS · GD -7
Last 5
D W W L L
8 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Inter Miami 2-2 D
  • DC United 0-2 W
  • DC United 2-1 W
  • Columbus Crew 0-2 L
  • New England Revolution 2-3 L
Team news
K. Fletcher — Knee Injury M. Miazga — Leg Injury S. Chirila — Leg Injury T. Anunga — Leg Injury R. Celentano — Rest G. Valenzuela — Red Card M. Robinson — Red Card A. Powell — Red Card K. Denkey — Red Card O. Nwobodo — Leg Injury N. Hagglund — Injury B. J. Ramirez Leon — Yellow Cards
Nashville SC
#1 · 71 PTS · GD +43
Last 5
D W D W W
11 GF · 2 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Philadelphia Union 0-0 D
  • CF Montreal 0-2 W
  • San Jose Earthquakes 1-1 D
  • Sporting Kansas City 4-0 W
  • Austin 1-4 W
Team news
S. Mohammed — Inactive X. Valdez — Illness M. Corcoran — Red Card S. Surridge — Illness R. Baker-Whiting — Injury C. Applewhite — Leg Injury T. Williams — Injury E. Tagseth — Injury P. Yazbek — Injury A. Najar — Thigh Injury C. Espinoza — Lower-Body Injury W. Madrigal — Lower-Body Injury

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with FC Cincinnati, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

FC Cincinnati
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Nashville SC
~100%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.70 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When FC Cincinnati is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.70 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Nashville SC win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on FC Cincinnati vs Nashville SC in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Nashville SC win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 0% / 100% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win FC Cincinnati vs Nashville SC, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.