UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60% UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60%
World Cup Women · World Cup Women - Quarter-finals Sep 9, 2026 · 18:45 Uber Arena Game Finished

Italy W
vs
Australia W.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Australia W (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 68–76 at 63% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Italy W win 0%

0 / 10 models

Australia W win 100%

10 / 10 models

Advertisement
— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Australia W win
78–79
67%
Australia W's greater international depth and athleticism make them the stronger side in this World Cup matchup, while Italy W should keep the game competitive through disciplined half-court defense. The Uber Arena setting offers limited true home advantage.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Australia W win
68–76
62%
Australia W has traditionally deeper roster and stronger international pedigree in women's basketball than Italy W, favoring a moderate away win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Australia W win
68–77
72%
Australia possesses greater frontcourt depth and elite international tournament pedigree, which should give them the interior edge against a disciplined Italy side.
04
Grok 4.6
Australia W win
68–79
62%
Australia’s World Cup pedigree should beat Italy even at Uber Arena with no true home crowd; missing form and H2H scores keep the margin and confidence moderate.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Australia W win
68–76
62%
Australia W have the more physical and deep rotation, though Italy W are disciplined and keep it close early in a neutral Uber Arena setting.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Australia W win
72–78
58%
Australia W traditionally stronger in World Cup settings with deeper roster; Italy W competitive but likely fall short in a moderate-scoring affair.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Australia W win
82–83
68%
Australia's World Cup pedigree and depth edge over Italy in neutral venue.
08
Kimi K3
Australia W win
68–76
62%
Australia W typically field stronger depth and physicality than Italy W in women's basketball; Opals' experience in major tournaments gives them edge despite neutral venue.
09
GLM 5.3
Australia W win
78–79
55%
Australia W's depth and physical defense typically edge Italy W; no H2H scores available and context is thin, so moderate confidence with a low-total, tight-margin line.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Australia W win
66–70
60%
Australia W's historical edge in women's basketball and World Cup experience suggest a narrow win, but Italy W's home venue at Uber Arena keeps the game competitive.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 9 models settled on 68–76. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 68–76
    3 models
  • 78–79
    2 models
  • 82–83
    1 model
  • 72–78
    1 model
  • 66–70
    1 model
  • 68–79
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Italy W vs Australia W in World Cup Women? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (68 - 76; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Australia W win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Italy W vs Australia W, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Australia W

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 63% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected points tilt 71.60 vs 77.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Advertisement

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

Compare their answers, read the reasoning, and see where they disagree. Try one question free each day.