CLU 1-2 SAN · 50% BEş 2-1 BAş · 54% RIZ 0-2 TRA · 57% FCC 2-0 ODE · 63% GAL 2-1 FEN · 48% SAN 1-2 BEN · 55% PAR 2-1 LYO · 48% SEV 1-0 OSA · 48% UNI 0-1 EST · 48% COR 1-1 GRE · 42% FLA 2-0 ATL · 60% INS 1-0 DEP · 55% ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% CLU 1-2 SAN · 50% BEş 2-1 BAş · 54% RIZ 0-2 TRA · 57% FCC 2-0 ODE · 63% GAL 2-1 FEN · 48% SAN 1-2 BEN · 55% PAR 2-1 LYO · 48% SEV 1-0 OSA · 48% UNI 0-1 EST · 48% COR 1-1 GRE · 42% FLA 2-0 ATL · 60% INS 1-0 DEP · 55% ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54%
World Cup Women · World Cup Women - Semi-finals Sep 10, 2026 · 18:45 Uber Arena Game Finished

Australia W
vs
Spain W.

Quick answer

Who will win Australia W vs Spain W?

Final score: Australia W 66–89 Spain W. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Australia W to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 74–68.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before tip-off. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Australia W (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 74–68 at 70% mean confidence (High band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Australia W win 100%

10 / 10 models

Spain W win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Australia W win
76–68
61%
Australia’s recent head-to-head edge, including a 75-66 win in 2024, supports them in this likely half-court quarter-final. Spain’s disciplined defense should keep the margin moderate at the neutral Berlin venue.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Australia W win
74–70
58%
Australia has won recent H2H meetings and Spain's roster turnover adds uncertainty; quarter-final intensity favors a tight, defensive contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Australia W win
74–68
61%
Australia have held the upper hand in recent competitive meetings, leveraging superior interior physicality and rebounding to edge past Spain in tightly contested knockout basketball.
04
Grok 4.6
Australia W win
75–68
58%
Australia won the last two meetings 75-66 and 72-66. World Cup QF scoring stays in the low 70s; home listing and recent H2H edge Australia in a modest-margin game.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Australia W win
74–68
58%
Australia W won the last two meetings with Spain W, including a 75-66 result in 2024, and their balanced scoring should edge a tight quarter-final at a neutral venue.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Australia W win
74–68
62%
Australia W won both recent H2H meetings by 6-9 points; quarter-final intensity suggests a tight, defensive contest with Australia's edge holding.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Australia W win
78–72
60%
Australia's recent H2H edge and home designation in neutral venue favor them slightly.
08
Kimi K3
Australia W win
74–68
62%
Australia W won the two most recent H2H meetings and bring a deeper, physical roster; Spain W keep it competitive in a typically low-possession, defensive quarter-final.
09
GLM 5.3
Australia W win
74–68
58%
Australia won the last two H2H meetings, including 2024, and quarter-final neutral-venue pressure suggests a low-scoring grind; Opals' depth edges Spain's half-court game.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Australia W win
73–66
60%
Australia W won the last two H2H meetings with close margins; neutral venue may limit home advantage, but past form suggests they can edge out Spain W in this quarter-final.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 74–68. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 74–68
    5 models
  • 76–68
    1 model
  • 74–70
    1 model
  • 78–72
    1 model
  • 73–66
    1 model
  • 75–68
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Australia W

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before tip-off.

02
High confidence

Mean 70% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected points tilt 74.60 vs 68.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Australia W vs Spain W in World Cup Women? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (74 - 68; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before tip-off.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Australia W win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Australia W vs Spain W, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.