EXM 1-0 THA · 49% SEA 2-1 REA · 56% AND 0-0 MAL · 52% NET 1-1 GER · 53% SER 1-0 GRE · 54% POR 2-0 WAL · 61% NOR 1-1 DEN · 53% AUS 2-0 ISR · 58% KOS 1-1 REP · 51% LIE 0-1 LIT · 59% BOR 2-1 WER · 63% RBL 2-1 EIN · 62% 189 2-1 HAM · 60% SCF 2-0 FCS · 63% EXM 1-0 THA · 49% SEA 2-1 REA · 56% AND 0-0 MAL · 52% NET 1-1 GER · 53% SER 1-0 GRE · 54% POR 2-0 WAL · 61% NOR 1-1 DEN · 53% AUS 2-0 ISR · 58% KOS 1-1 REP · 51% LIE 0-1 LIT · 59% BOR 2-1 WER · 63% RBL 2-1 EIN · 62% 189 2-1 HAM · 60% SCF 2-0 FCS · 63%
NPB Sep 22, 2026 · 09:00 Finished

Yakult Swallows
vs
Hanshin Tigers.

Quick answer

Who will win Yakult Swallows vs Hanshin Tigers?

Final score: Yakult Swallows 7–9 Hanshin Tigers. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Hanshin Tigers to win (100%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Hanshin Tigers (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–5 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Yakult Swallows beat Hanshin Tigers in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yakult Swallows win 0%

0 / 10 models

Hanshin Tigers win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Hanshin Tigers win
5–6
57%
Hanshin won three of the five latest meetings and scored at least six twice, while Yakult’s home advantage keeps this projected as a close, moderately high-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Tigers won 4 of last 5 head-to-head meetings, including recent series, showing consistent edge over Swallows this season.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Hanshin Tigers win
2–4
60%
Hanshin's superior pitching depth gives them an edge over Yakult's volatile staff at Meiji Jingu Stadium, holding the Swallows' offense in check.
04
Grok 4.6
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Hanshin took two of three at Yakult in early September and three of the last five overall; modest away edge, typical NPB run total.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Hanshin Tigers win
4–5
61%
Hanshin won two of the last three meetings and scored 7 and 6 runs in those wins, showing an edge over Yakult's pitching. Yakult's home form has been inconsistent, so a moderate Hanshin victory fits recent head-to-head trends.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
62%
Hanshin won 3 of last 5 H2H including two convincing road wins at Yakult in early September; Tigers' superior run production in this matchup supports an away victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Hanshin Tigers win
6–7
62%
Recent H2H favors Tigers' offense; Swallows' home form inconsistent. Tigers' momentum and power edge.
08
Kimi K3
Hanshin Tigers win
3–5
58%
Hanshin took two of three in the September series at Yakult and three of the last five overall, showing a slight edge in this matchup. Expect a tight, lower-scoring contest with the Tigers prevailing late.
09
GLM 5.3
Hanshin Tigers win
5–6
55%
Hanshin took three of the last five meetings with stronger scoring bursts (7 and 6 runs); Yakult's home edge keeps it close but Tigers' offense edges it.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Hanshin Tigers win
4–5
62%
Hanshin Tigers have won 3 of the last 5 head-to-head, including the most recent meeting, and show a slight edge in recent form.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 3–5. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 3–5
    4 models
  • 5–6
    2 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 6–7
    1 model
  • 2–4
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yakult Swallows vs Hanshin Tigers in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 5; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Hanshin Tigers win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yakult Swallows vs Hanshin Tigers, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Hanshin Tigers

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.80 vs 5.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.