GPT-5.6 Luna
24% yes
Probably not — the blockade was still being described as active and enforced as of October 14, with no confirmed U.S. announcement ending or suspending it. The main way this could resolve Yes is a rapid diplomatic agreement or White House/Pentagon statement formally announcing a general termination before the October 31 deadline.
Claude Sonnet 5
30% yes
Likely not yet — there's momentum toward a deal (Iranian official claims lifting ahead of a formal signing) but no confirmed official US government announcement as of Oct 14, and resolution requires a clear, unambiguous US statement, not just Iranian claims. Given active diplomatic progress and a signing reportedly planned, there's meaningful but sub-50% chance the US formally announces an end before Oct 31. Could be proven wrong by a quick formal US statement tied to the signing event.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
28% yes
Probably not — while diplomatic claims suggest a deal may be in progress ahead of a formal signing, the U.S. continues active interdiction operations and has not made any official announcement lifting the blockade. With only about two weeks remaining until October 31, negotiations could easily drag out or stall. The main factor that could prove this wrong is a rapid breakthrough resulting in a formal U.S. declaration before the end of the month.
Grok 4.6
18% yes
Probably not — the blockade was still described as actively enforced as of Oct 12-14 with no confirmed U.S. government announcement of an end, and the Iranian claim of a lift is unofficial. Only ~16 days remain until the cutoff, so a qualifying public U.S. declaration is unlikely without a sudden deal. A last-minute diplomatic agreement or White House statement could still reverse this.
DeepSeek V4 Pro
18% yes
Probably not — as of October 14, 2026, multiple reports still describe the blockade as active and being enforced, and no confirmed U.S. government announcement of its end has been found. The only claim of lifting comes from an Iranian deputy foreign minister, which does not meet the requirement for an official U.S. announcement. The main risk is a sudden diplomatic breakthrough or deal signing before October 31 that prompts a formal U.S. statement.
Qwen 3.8 Max
25% yes
Probably not — as of mid-October the blockade remains actively enforced with no confirmed US government announcement of its end, and the resolution rules strictly require an official US statement. The Iranian deputy FM's claim of a lifting 'ahead of a planned formal signing' hints at diplomatic progress, but that alone does not meet the threshold. A last-minute deal announcement before October 31 is possible but would require a rapid and publicly confirmed US policy reversal.
Mistral Medium 3.5
25% yes
Probably not — U.S. officials have not confirmed lifting the blockade, and recent reports still describe it as active. The Iranian claim lacks official U.S. backing. A sudden U.S. policy reversal could prove me wrong.
Kimi K3
25% yes
Probably not — as of October 15 the blockade remains officially in effect per multiple reports, and only an Iranian official's unconfirmed claim suggests it was lifted, which doesn't satisfy the U.S.-government announcement requirement. A formal signing is reportedly planned, so a U.S. announcement before October 31 is plausible if a deal closes, giving meaningful YES odds. The main risk to this call is that the rumored agreement is finalized and announced by Trump or the State Department within the next two weeks.
GLM 5.3
35% yes
Probably not — reports as of Oct 12-14 still describe the blockade as active and enforced, with only an unconfirmed Iranian claim of a lifting, not a U.S. announcement. However, the Iranian deputy FM's statement suggests a deal with formal signing may be imminent, which could trigger a U.S. announcement before Oct 31. The main thing that could prove me wrong is a U.S.-Iran agreement signing announcement in the next two weeks.
MiMo V2.5 Pro
22% yes
Probably not — the blockade is still being described as active and enforced as of October 12–14, and no U.S. government announcement of an end or suspension has been confirmed. The Iranian deputy foreign minister's claim that it was lifted doesn't qualify under the rules, which require a U.S. or authorized U.S. announcement. What could prove me wrong: a formal signing/announcement in the next two weeks, which the Iranian statement hints at, could trigger a qualifying declaration before the deadline.
News the AIs read (Oct 15)
- On July 13-14, 2026, U.S. officials publicly announced that the United States was reinstating a naval blockade of Iranian ports and vessels, and the blockade took effect on July 14, 2026.
- A separate report on October 13, 2026 says an Iranian deputy foreign minister claimed the blockade had been lifted ahead of a planned formal signing, but that claim is not the same as a confirmed U.S. government announcement.
- On October 12-14, 2026, multiple reports still described the blockade as active and being enforced, including claims of continued U.S. interdictions and mariner warnings.
- No current source found here confirms that the U.S. government, or an authorized U.S. representative, officially announced ending, terminating, lifting, or suspending the blockade by October 31, 2026.
Resolution rules
On July 13, 2026, Trump announced the United States would reinstate its naval blockade of Iran, targeting Iranian ships and customers.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States government, or an authorized representative of the United States government, publicly and officially announces the end, termination, lifting, or suspension of the United States’ naval blockade on Iranian ships and ships of Iranian customers, between market creation and the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
An announcement qualifies if it communicates that the United States will generally cease blocking vessel traffic for Iranian ships and customers, including an announcement that the blockade will not take effect at all, even if some restrictions remain (for example, an imposition of fees). An announcement does not qualify if it reflects only a limited or partial change that stops short of a general end or suspension of the blockade, for example, an exemption for a specific vessel, cargo, or port.
A qualifying announcement must be a declarative statement of the United States government’s present termination or suspension of the blockade, previously-unannounced prior termination or suspension of the blockade, or definitive decision to terminate or suspend the blockade.
A qualifying announcement must clearly and unambiguously identify the end or suspension of the blockade. Statements that merely allude to, reference, or describe an end to the blockade, without clearly communicating it, do not qualify. The announcement need not use specific terminology or reference the end of a blockade by name; an announcement of a resumption of prior obligations, the maintenance of a status quo, or a return to a previously agreed baseline qualifies, provided the substantive policy of ending or suspending the blockade is clearly and unambiguously communicated.
A qualifying announcement must be made through official channels, by an individual acting in an official capacity. Statements made incidentally or informally in a context not intended for official communication do not qualify.
The following do not qualify:
Anonymous, unattributed, or leaked statements not confirmed as official;
Statements by persons not authorized to speak for the United States government;
Third-party speculation, analysis, or predictions that the United States government will announce or implement an end to the blockade;
Satirical, fabricated, hacked, or impersonated c...
Market prices: Polymarket. TuringStats is not affiliated with Polymarket.