EST 0-1 INS · 48% MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% EST 0-1 INS · 48% MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50%
KHL Finished

Tractor Chelyabinsk
vs
Avangard Omsk.

Quick answer

Who will win Tractor Chelyabinsk vs Avangard Omsk?

Final score: Tractor Chelyabinsk 2–1 Avangard Omsk. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Avangard Omsk to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–4.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 61% of the time (362 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Avangard Omsk (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 62% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Tractor Chelyabinsk win 0%

0 / 10 models

Avangard Omsk win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Avangard Omsk win
3–4
64%
Avangard has won all five listed recent meetings, including three in Chelyabinsk, while Tractor’s home advantage should keep this competitive. A tight, moderate-scoring away victory is the best fit.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Avangard Omsk win
3–4
58%
Avangard has won all five recent H2H meetings, often in high-scoring affairs; expect a close but Avangard-favored shootout.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Avangard Omsk win
2–3
62%
Avangard Omsk has dominated recent head-to-head encounters with superior offensive execution, giving them a slight edge even playing away in Chelyabinsk.
04
Grok 4.7
Avangard Omsk win
2–4
62%
Avangard won all five recent H2H meetings, often by multiple goals. Home ice may keep Tractor closer, but the matchup still favors Omsk's attack.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Avangard Omsk win
4–5
62%
Avangard has won the last four meetings and scored heavily in most, including 6-2 and 5-2 away wins; Tractor's defence has struggled against them.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Avangard Omsk win
2–4
72%
Avangard dominated all five recent H2H meetings convincingly, including blowouts. Their offensive depth and consistent edge over Tractor suggest another comfortable away victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Avangard Omsk win
4–5
72%
Avangard dominated recent H2H (5 wins in last 5, 24-10 aggregate) and maintains stronger offensive form.
08
Kimi K3
Avangard Omsk win
2–4
68%
Avangard Omsk has dominated this matchup, winning the last five meetings including high-scoring victories. Tractor Chelyabinsk's defense has consistently struggled against Avangard's attack, making an away win the most probable outcome.
09
GLM 5.3
Avangard Omsk win
2–4
62%
Avangard has won five straight H2H meetings, including twice in Chelyabinsk, outscoring Tractor 23-10; despite roster turnover, that edge plus stronger attack supports an away win.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Avangard Omsk win
2–4
68%
Avangard dominated recent H2H (5-0-0), scoring 23 goals to 7, and their offensive pattern suggests a multi-goal win despite Tractor's home venue.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 2–4. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–4
    5 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 2–3
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Avangard Omsk

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 62% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.60 vs 4.10

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Tractor Chelyabinsk vs Avangard Omsk in KHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Avangard Omsk win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Tractor Chelyabinsk vs Avangard Omsk, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.