MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62% MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62%
NHL After Over Time

Pittsburgh Penguins
vs
Utah Mammoth.

Quick answer

Who will win Pittsburgh Penguins vs Utah Mammoth?

6 of 10 AI models pick Pittsburgh Penguins to win (60%). The mean predicted score is 4–3 at 55% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Pittsburgh Penguins (6 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–3 at 55% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Pittsburgh Penguins win 60%

6 / 10 models

Utah Mammoth win 40%

4 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Pittsburgh Penguins win
4–3
54%
Recent meetings are tightly contested and high scoring, with Utah winning the latest 5-4. Pittsburgh’s home venue provides a modest counterbalance, making a narrow Penguins victory in another open game plausible.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Pittsburgh Penguins win
4–3
54%
Recent meetings show high-scoring, close games including a Penguins road win last week; home ice and offensive trend favor Pittsburgh narrowly.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Pittsburgh Penguins win
4–3
55%
Recent meetings between these two have been consistently tight and high-scoring. Back on home ice, Pittsburgh should edge out Utah in another close one-goal contest.
04
Grok 4.7
Pittsburgh Penguins win
4–3
56%
Recent H2H is high-scoring and split; Penguins get a modest home edge after losing 5-4 in Utah nine days ago.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Pittsburgh Penguins win
4–3
52%
H2H is tight with alternating results; Pittsburgh's home venue and Utah's recent 5-4 win suggest another close, high-event game.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Utah Mammoth win
3–4
53%
Utah won both prior visits to Pittsburgh and the most recent meeting (5-4). High-scoring H2H pattern persists, but home ice keeps it close.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Utah Mammoth win
4–5
60%
Utah won 3 of last 5 H2H, including recent 5-4; Penguins home but Mammoth's attack edges it.
08
Kimi K3
Utah Mammoth win
3–4
56%
Utah won 5-4 nine days ago and took three of the last five H2H; these matchups trend high-scoring and tight, so Mammoth's recent edge slightly outweighs Pittsburgh's home ice.
09
GLM 5.3
Utah Mammoth win
4–5
52%
Utah won the recent meeting 5-4 and three of the last five H2H, edging Pittsburgh's attack; home ice only partly offsets that, so a tight road win fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Pittsburgh Penguins win
4–3
55%
Recent meetings with Utah have been high-scoring and tight, with Pittsburgh taking two of the last three; home ice gives slight edge in what projects as an open, evenly matched game.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 4–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–3
    6 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Pittsburgh Penguins

60% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 55% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.80 vs 3.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Pittsburgh Penguins vs Utah Mammoth in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Pittsburgh Penguins win, with vote shares roughly 60% / 40% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Pittsburgh Penguins vs Utah Mammoth, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.