Fulham
vs
Crystal Palace.
Quick answer
Who will win Fulham vs Crystal Palace?
Final score: Fulham 0–1 Crystal Palace. Before kickoff, 9 of 10 AI models pick Crystal Palace to win (90%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 1–2.
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Crystal Palace (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 50% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
1 / 10 models
0 / 10 models
9 / 10 models
10 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
9 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.
-
1–2
9 models
-
2–1
1 model
Live match centre
Full-timeMomentum, live stats, xG, player ratings and every event, minute by minute.
Unlock with Pro in the appBookmakers vs the AI panel
Bet365 · 1.67 / 4.00 / 4.75Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.
Confirmed lineups: Fulham vs Crystal Palace
Fulham
Bench: Manuel Ángel, H. Reed, Jorge Cuenca, T. Castagne, T. Cairney, Gonzalo García, Joshua King, B. Leno, Kevin
Crystal Palace
P. Sage
Bench: A. Disasi, Z. Gozo, D. Kamada, A. Khalaili, D. McNeil, T. Mitchell, Yeremy Pino, A. Wharton, W. Benítez
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in Fulham's and Crystal Palace's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
Fulham (at home)
W
D
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
|
Crystal Palace (away)
D
L
L
D
W
L
D
L
L
L
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
50%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
10%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
| Drew |
10%
All games 20% (2/10)
|
30%
All games 20% (2/10)
|
| Over 1.5 goals |
60%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
90%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
| Over 2.5 goals |
40%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
80%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
| Over 3.5 goals |
30%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
60%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
| Both teams scored |
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
50%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
| Scored |
80%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
50%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
| Clean sheet |
30%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
10%
All games 20% (2/10)
|
| Over 9.5 corners |
80%
All games 67% (6/9)
|
40%
All games 38% (3/8)
|
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
80%
All games 44% (4/9)
|
40%
All games 63% (5/8)
|
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
League Cup numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
Fulham
4-2-3-1- W-D-L
- 2-0-0
- Goals
- 6-2
- Clean sheets
- 1
- Failed to score
- 0
- Best win run
- 2
- Penalties
- 0/0
Crystal Palace
5-4-1- W-D-L
- 1-0-0
- Goals
- 3-0
- Clean sheets
- 1
- Failed to score
- 0
- Best win run
- 1
- Penalties
- 0/0
Key players · Fulham
-
Rodrigo Muniz
2 G · 0 A · 3 apps
Key players · Crystal Palace
-
J. Strand Larsen
2 G · 1 A · 1 apps
-
Óscar Mingueza
0 G · 2 A · 2 apps
Top scorers · League Cup
- 1 H. Leonard Peterborough 4
- 2 R. Cleary Barnsley 3
- 3 T. Barry Everton 3
- 4 C. Evans Fleetwood Town 3
- 5 V. Castellanos West Ham 3
What’s moving the panel.
90% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 50% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Match stats forecast
Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.
| Metric | Fulham | Crystal Palace | Expected total | Lean | Actual | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 6.3 | 3.2 | 9.5 | Under 9.5 52% | 9 hit | Ask AI |
| Yellow cards | 2.2 | 2.0 | 4.2 | Under 4.5 59% | 3 hit | Ask AI |
| Shots | 17.0 | 10.2 | 27.2 | Under 27.5 54% | 18 hit | Ask AI |
| Shots on target | 5.3 | 3.7 | 9.0 | Under 9.5 59% | 7 hit | Ask AI |
Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 304 graded matches, cards 59% of 305. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.
Actual Crystal Palace win · AI Crystal Palace win
Form, history, team news.
- Aston Villa 1-1 D
- Crystal Palace 0-1 L
- Coventry 0-1 W
- Hull City 1-0 W
- Ipswich 2-1 L
No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.
- Tottenham 2-0 L
- Fulham 0-1 W
- Newcastle 0-2 L
- Beşiktaş 2-2 D
- Brighton 5-0 L
No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.
Last five meetings.
FUL 0 · D 1 · CRY 4
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 10% of models side with Fulham, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight League Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 3.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When Fulham is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 3.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Crystal Palace win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on Fulham vs Crystal Palace in League Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Crystal Palace win, with vote shares roughly 10% / 0% / 90% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win Fulham vs Crystal Palace, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
Related matches
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Lyon vs Crystal Palace prediction for the UEFA Europa League league stage, with the AI panel unanimous on a narrow Lyon home win at Groupama Stadium.
Fulham vs Manchester United prediction: AI models give Manchester United an 80% win chance in this Premier League clash at Craven Cottage.
Liverpool vs Fulham prediction for the Premier League clash at Anfield. See the AI panel consensus, most common score and confidence level.
Buffalo Bills vs Baltimore Ravens prediction for NFL Week 10: the AI panel unanimously backs the Bills at Highmark Stadium, with a 27-20 scoreline.
Racing Santander vs Real Madrid prediction: AI panel unanimously backs Real Madrid in La Liga clash at El Sardinero. Full model consensus and score…
Liverpool vs Arsenal prediction for their Premier League clash at Anfield. AI panel consensus: 60% draw, most common score 1-1, average confidence 41%.
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.