MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62% MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 33 Audi Field, Washington Match Finished · 90'

DC United
vs
FC Cincinnati.

Quick answer

Who will win DC United vs FC Cincinnati?

Final score: DC United 0–2 FC Cincinnati. Before kickoff, 6 of 10 AI models pick FC Cincinnati to win (60%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 1–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → DC United form FC Cincinnati form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward FC Cincinnati (6 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 46% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Major League Soccer table Where DC United and FC Cincinnati stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

DC United win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 40%

4 / 10 models

FC Cincinnati win 60%

6 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Draw
1–1
28%
DC United's home advantage and Baribo's scoring threat counter Cincinnati's stronger attacking output through Denkey and Evander. Both defenses have conceded heavily, but mixed recent form makes a balanced 1-1 the likeliest exact line.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
FC Cincinnati win
1–2
47%
Cincinnati's attack (Denkey, Evander) outscores DC United's porous defense (51 conceded); DC United's poor recent form (LDLWL) weighs against home edge.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
FC Cincinnati win
1–2
48%
Cincinnati's attack with Denkey and Evander is significantly more potent than DC's offense, giving the visitors an edge despite fragile defenses on both sides.
04
Grok 4.7
Draw
1–1
38%
Both sides in poor form (LDLWL vs DLWLL) and leaky; DC fail to score often, Cin attack better but also concede freely. Even Audi Field tilt points to a low-event stalemate.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
FC Cincinnati win
1–2
48%
Cincinnati's stronger attack (60 goals, Denkey and Evander) faces a DC side with 51 conceded and poor recent form. H2H shows tight away wins, supporting a narrow Cincinnati victory.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
FC Cincinnati win
1–2
48%
Cincinnati's potent attack (60 goals, Denkey/Evander) exploits DC United's leaky defense (51 conceded), but Cincinnati's own poor defense allows DC a goal back.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
FC Cincinnati win
1–2
62%
Cincinnati's attacking firepower (Denkey, Evander) and DC's defensive frailty (51 conceded) tilt this; H2H splits but away form and goals edge favor visitors.
08
Kimi K3
FC Cincinnati win
1–2
45%
Both defenses leak heavily, but Cincinnati's Denkey-Evander attack outguns Baribo-dependent DC; Cincinnati also won its last two visits to Audi Field, though DC's 12 draws keep confidence modest.
09
GLM 5.3
Draw
1–1
52%
Both sides are mid-table with patchy form (DC LDLWL, Cincinnati DLWLL); DC's 12 draws and Cincinnati's leaky defense (2 clean sheets) point to a tight, shared result.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Draw
1–1
42%
Both sides draw heavily (12 and 9) with leaky defenses but reliable scorers in Baribo and Denkey; DC's home edge is offset by Cincinnati's stronger attack, pointing to a shared spoils outcome.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–2
    6 models
  • 1–1
    4 models

Live match centre

Full-time
DC United
0–2
FC Cincinnati
Evander 35'
Tom Barlow 52'
Pro

Momentum, live stats, xG, player ratings and every event, minute by minute.

Unlock with Pro in the app

Bookmakers vs the AI panel

Bet365 · 2.80 / 4.00 / 2.25
DC United Market 34% · AI 0%
Draw Market 24% · AI 40%
FC Cincinnati Market 42% · AI 60%

Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 10 AI models picking each result.

Team news

Confirmed lineups: DC United vs FC Cincinnati

DC United

4-4-2
R. Weiler
9 T. Baribo
9 Baribo
25 J. Hopkins
25 Hopkins
7 Peglow
7 Peglow
21 A. Dozzell
21 Dozzell
23 B. Servania
23 Servania
2 K. Nono
2 Nono
6 K. Kurokawa
6 Kurokawa
15 K. Rowles
15 Rowles
3 L. Bartlett
3 Bartlett
5 S. Hefti
5 Hefti
1 S. Johnson
1 Johnson

Bench: C. Antley, O. Avilez, K. Castillo, Nikola Markovic, S. Nealis, N. Ordaz, M. Peltola, J. Stroud, A. Bono

FC Cincinnati

3-5-2
Pat Noonan
9 K. Denkey
9 Denkey
16 T. Barlow
16 Barlow
29 Bryan Josías Ramírez León
29 León
5 O. Nwobodo
5 Nwobodo
10 Evander
10 Evander
20 P. Bucha
20 Bucha
23 D. Douděra
23 Douděra
15 T. Hadebe
15 Hadebe
4 N. Hagglund
4 Hagglund
24 K. Smith
24 Smith
18 R. Celentano
18 Celentano

Bench: S. Gidi, A. Jabbari, E. Louro, K. Mboma Dem, A. Powell, A. Chirila, G. Valenzuela, B. Anunga, J. Martínez

Season data

Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

DC United

4-4-2
W-D-L
7-12-13
Goals
39-57
Clean sheets
6
Failed to score
10
Best win run
2
Penalties
6/6
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

FC Cincinnati

3-5-2
W-D-L
11-10-11
Goals
66-73
Clean sheets
3
Failed to score
5
Best win run
2
Penalties
6/6
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · DC United

  • T. Baribo 16 G · 1 A · 25 apps

Key players · FC Cincinnati

  • Evander 13 G · 11 A · 29 apps
  • K. Denkey 17 G · 3 A · 30 apps

Top scorers · Major League Soccer

  1. 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 25
  2. 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
  3. 3 Rafael Navarro St. Louis City 19
  4. 4 M. Iloski Philadelphia Union 19
  5. 5 D. Bouanga Los Angeles FC 18
Venue Audi Field, Washington
Referee Jon Freemon
New at DC United C. Antley (Tampa Bay Rowdies), K. Nono (Kashima), N. Ordaz (Los Angeles FC)
New at FC Cincinnati T. Malacia (Manchester United), J. Malatini (Werder Bremen), D. Douděra (Slavia Praha)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors FC Cincinnati

60% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 46% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.00 vs 1.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Result check

Actual FC Cincinnati win · AI FC Cincinnati win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

DC United
#13 · 33 PTS · GD -18
Last 5
L L L L L
3 GF · 13 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Columbus Crew 3-0 L
  • Toronto FC 2-1 L
  • FC Cincinnati 0-2 L
  • FC Cincinnati 2-1 L
  • Orlando City SC 4-1 L
Team news
S. Johnson — Leg Injury H. Kijima — Leg Injury L. Munteanu — Leg Injury G. Segal — Leg Injury
FC Cincinnati
#8 · 43 PTS · GD -7
Last 5
W D W W L
7 GF · 5 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Philadelphia Union 1-0 W
  • Inter Miami 2-2 D
  • DC United 0-2 W
  • DC United 2-1 W
  • Columbus Crew 0-2 L
Team news
E. Echenique — Leg Injury T. Malacia — Ankle Injury J. Malatini — Thigh Injury M. Robinson — Leg Injury J. Martinez — Knee Injury
— Head to head

Last five meetings.

DCU 2 · D 1 · FCC 2

FCC VS DCU
1-2
AWAY WIN
May 31, 2025
DCU VS FCC
0-1
AWAY WIN
Apr 12, 2025
DCU VS FCC
2-3
AWAY WIN
Jul 3, 2024
FCC VS DCU
0-0
DRAW
Mar 10, 2024
DCU VS FCC
3-0
HOME WIN
Jun 24, 2023

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with DC United, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 40% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

DC United
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~40%
implied lean
FC Cincinnati
~60%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.60 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.9 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When DC United is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.60 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: FC Cincinnati win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on DC United vs FC Cincinnati in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is FC Cincinnati win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 40% / 60% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win DC United vs FC Cincinnati, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.