CHI 2-0 YAT · 56% BRA 1-0 NEE · 54% CRO 0-2 HAM · 61% DAG 2-0 WAL · 62% FAR 2-0 UXB · 56% FAR 2-1 CIR · 53% GAI 1-0 LEA · 50% MAI 2-0 CRA · 57% TRU 2-1 MER · 53% WIM 1-2 WES · 53% WIN 0-1 HEM · 52% WOR 1-2 AFC · 53% DOR 2-0 SOU · 60% EXM 1-0 THA · 49% CHI 2-0 YAT · 56% BRA 1-0 NEE · 54% CRO 0-2 HAM · 61% DAG 2-0 WAL · 62% FAR 2-0 UXB · 56% FAR 2-1 CIR · 53% GAI 1-0 LEA · 50% MAI 2-0 CRA · 57% TRU 2-1 MER · 53% WIM 1-2 WES · 53% WIN 0-1 HEM · 52% WOR 1-2 AFC · 53% DOR 2-0 SOU · 60% EXM 1-0 THA · 49%
KHL Sep 19, 2026 · 07:00 Finished

Vladivostok
vs
Cherepovets.

Quick answer

Who will win Vladivostok vs Cherepovets?

Final score: Vladivostok 2–0 Cherepovets. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Cherepovets to win (100%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Cherepovets (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–3 at 62% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Vladivostok beat Cherepovets in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Vladivostok win 0%

0 / 10 models

Cherepovets win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Cherepovets win
3–4
68%
Cherepovets have won all five listed recent meetings, including both 2025 games. Vladivostok’s home ice should keep this close, but the consistent matchup edge favors another narrow Cherepovets victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Cherepovets win
2–3
55%
Cherepovets have won the last two head-to-head meetings and generally outscored Vladivostok in recent encounters, suggesting a slight edge despite home ice.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Cherepovets win
2–3
60%
Cherepovets has consistently controlled recent meetings against Vladivostok, effectively neutralizing their home-ice advantage with superior transition play and structured defensive discipline.
04
Grok 4.6
Cherepovets win
2–3
58%
Cherepovets won all five recent H2H meetings, often by one goal. Home ice for Vladivostok should keep it tight, not reverse the series pattern.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Cherepovets win
3–4
62%
Cherepovets has won four of the last five meetings, including both most recent games. Vladivostok's home edge is offset by their poor scoring record in this matchup.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Cherepovets win
2–3
62%
Cherepovets dominated recent H2H (5 straight wins), including two road victories in Vladivostok. Away form edge and consistent scoring pattern support a narrow Cherepovets win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Cherepovets win
4–5
68%
Cherepovets won 4 of last 5 H2H, including 3-2 and 4-1 recently; Vladivostok struggles to contain their speed.
08
Kimi K3
Cherepovets win
2–3
62%
Cherepovets has won all five recent H2H meetings, including twice in Vladivostok; that sustained edge outweighs home ice, though margins stay tight.
09
GLM 5.3
Cherepovets win
3–4
58%
Cherepovets has won all five recent H2H meetings, including twice in Vladivostok, suggesting a matchup edge despite home venue; expect a tight, low-scoring KHL game.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Cherepovets win
2–3
62%
Cherepovets has won the last five H2H meetings, showing a consistent edge over Vladivostok; their recent form and historical dominance suggest an away victory.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 2–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–3
    6 models
  • 3–4
    3 models
  • 4–5
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Vladivostok vs Cherepovets in KHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Cherepovets win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Vladivostok vs Cherepovets, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Cherepovets

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 62% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.50 vs 3.50

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.