BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
Liiga Sep 26, 2026 · 14:00 Finished

Vaasan Sport
vs
Karpat.

Quick answer

Who will win Vaasan Sport vs Karpat?

Final score: Vaasan Sport 1–2 Karpat. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Karpat to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 2–3.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Karpat (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–3 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Vaasan Sport beat Karpat in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Vaasan Sport win 0%

0 / 10 models

Karpat win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Karpat win
3–4
63%
Karpat won the most recent meeting 3-2 and has controlled this matchup across several recent results. Vaasan Sport’s home ice should keep the game close, but Karpat’s recent head-to-head edge supports a narrow away win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Karpat win
2–3
55%
Karpat won the most recent meeting and lead the H2H series overall, showing stronger recent edge despite close scorelines.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Karpat win
2–3
62%
Karpat holds superior roster depth and has dominated recent encounters, including a tight 3-2 victory just days ago. Expect another closely contested, low-margin win for the visitors.
04
Grok 4.6
Karpat win
2–3
58%
Karpat took the last meeting 3-2 and have dominated most recent H2H. Sport’s home ice keeps it tight, not a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Karpat win
3–4
58%
Karpat won the most recent meeting 3-2 and have generally had the edge in this matchup; Vaasan Sport's home advantage keeps it close but not enough to overturn.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Karpat win
1–3
62%
Karpat won 3 of last 5 H2H including a 3-2 win just a week ago; their superior depth and recent dominance over Sport support an away victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Karpat win
3–4
60%
Karpat won 3 of last 5 H2H, including recent 3-2; Sport struggles to contain their offense.
08
Kimi K3
Karpat win
2–3
58%
Karpat have won three of the last four H2H meetings including a 3-2 win a week ago, showing they match up well against Sport. Expect another tight, low-scoring Liiga contest with Karpat edging it.
09
GLM 5.3
Karpat win
3–4
58%
Karpat have won four of the last five meetings, including 3-2 and 6-0 over Sport, and look stronger despite the away venue; moderate totals fit Liiga's low-scoring pace.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Karpat win
2–3
62%
Karpat won the last head-to-head and historically dominate this fixture; Vaasan Sport's home venue offers a chance, but Karpat's recent form suggests a narrow away victory.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 2–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–3
    5 models
  • 3–4
    4 models
  • 1–3
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Vaasan Sport vs Karpat in Liiga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Karpat win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Vaasan Sport vs Karpat, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Karpat

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.30 vs 3.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.