ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% SGS 0-2 FCA · 61% HAM 1-2 EIN · 45% ROT 0-2 RBL · 62% SAS 0-2 LAZ · 62% CUA 0-2 GIR · 65% AIK 0-1 IFE · 48% CAL 1-0 EUR · 47% PIN 0-2 ELC · 58% SES 0-2 ESP · 61% CAS 0-2 ALM · 63% ATL 0-2 MIR · 58% CIU 0-1 RAY · 51% ABH 1-1 AL- · 41% VFL 1-2 FSV · 54% SGS 0-2 FCA · 61% HAM 1-2 EIN · 45% ROT 0-2 RBL · 62% SAS 0-2 LAZ · 62% CUA 0-2 GIR · 65% AIK 0-1 IFE · 48% CAL 1-0 EUR · 47% PIN 0-2 ELC · 58% SES 0-2 ESP · 61% CAS 0-2 ALM · 63% ATL 0-2 MIR · 58% CIU 0-1 RAY · 51%
NHL Oct 28, 2026 · 01:00 Not Started

Utah Mammoth
vs
Minnesota Wild.

Quick answer

Who will win Utah Mammoth vs Minnesota Wild?

10 of 10 AI models pick Utah Mammoth to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 4–2 at 59% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before puck drop. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (344 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Utah Mammoth (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Utah Mammoth win 100%

10 / 10 models

Minnesota Wild win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
58%
Utah has dominated four of the last five meetings and owns home ice, while Minnesota's recent 5-0 win shows this is not one-sided. Utah's stronger head-to-head scoring profile supports a moderate home win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Utah Mammoth win
3–2
53%
Series is split recently with wild swings both ways; home ice and historical scoring output for Utah tips a close edge.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
58%
Utah has controlled most recent encounters against Minnesota, particularly on home ice where their offensive pace consistently creates scoring opportunities.
04
Grok 4.6
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
58%
Utah took four of five H2H meetings and both home games by multiple goals; venue plus that scoring pattern favors a 4-2 home win despite one recent road shutout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Utah Mammoth win
3–2
58%
Utah has won 3 of last 5 H2H, including two home wins, and holds venue advantage; Minnesota's recent 5-0 win suggests they can compete, but Utah's home form edges it.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
60%
Utah has dominated this H2H at home (5-2, 6-1 wins), though Minnesota's recent 5-0 shutout adds uncertainty. Home venue edge supports Utah.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
62%
H2H favors Utah at home; recent form suggests higher-scoring Mammoth offense.
08
Kimi K3
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
62%
Utah has won four of the last five head-to-heads, including a 5-2 home win in February, and holds the home-ice edge. Minnesota's lone recent win was a 5-0 outlier; Utah's offensive consistency in this matchup supports a multi-goal home victory.
09
GLM 5.3
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
58%
Utah has won four of the last five meetings with Minnesota, often by multi-goal margins, and hosts this one; Wild's recent 5-0 win adds some doubt, so confidence stays moderate.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Utah Mammoth win
4–2
58%
Utah won three of last four meetings at home, often scoring 5-6, and Minnesota's 5-0 win came in their own building. Utah's home attack against Wild defense favors a multi-goal home win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    8 models
  • 3–2
    2 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Utah Mammoth

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before puck drop.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.80 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Utah Mammoth vs Minnesota Wild in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before puck drop.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Utah Mammoth win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Utah Mammoth vs Minnesota Wild, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.