BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
NHL Oct 2, 2026 · 01:30 Finished

Utah Mammoth
vs
Chicago Blackhawks.

Quick answer

Who will win Utah Mammoth vs Chicago Blackhawks?

Final score: Utah Mammoth 6–0 Chicago Blackhawks. Before kickoff, 8 of 10 AI models pick Chicago Blackhawks to win (80%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–3.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Chicago Blackhawks (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–3 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Utah Mammoth beat Chicago Blackhawks in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Utah Mammoth win 20%

2 / 10 models

Chicago Blackhawks win 80%

8 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Chicago Blackhawks win
3–4
61%
Chicago won all four most recent meetings, including three relatively tight games in Utah. The Mammoth’s home ice should keep this close, but the Blackhawks’ recent matchup edge supports a narrow away victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Utah Mammoth win
4–3
55%
Season opener at home, recent H2H is split closely; Utah's venue edge and improving roster give slight advantage in a tight, high-scoring matchup.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Chicago Blackhawks win
2–3
60%
Chicago has controlled recent head-to-head meetings, consistently edging Utah in tight, one-goal defensive contests.
04
Grok 4.6
Chicago Blackhawks win
2–3
58%
Chicago took four of the last five H2H, including three recent wins. Utah’s home ice may keep it close, but Blackhawks’ edge in those meetings supports a one-goal away win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Chicago Blackhawks win
2–4
68%
Chicago has won four of the last five meetings, including three on Utah's ice, and their recent head-to-head scoring edge suggests they control this matchup.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Chicago Blackhawks win
2–3
62%
Chicago won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings convincingly, including two shutout-margin wins. Blackhawks' recent dominance over Utah suggests they carry the edge even on the road.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Chicago Blackhawks win
4–5
60%
Blackhawks have recent H2H edge and consistent scoring; Mammoth struggles defensively in prior meetings.
08
Kimi K3
Utah Mammoth win
2–1
62%
Utah's home advantage and recent defensive improvements offset Chicago's historical dominance; expect tight defensive battle.
09
GLM 5.3
Chicago Blackhawks win
3–4
55%
Chicago won four of the last five meetings, including three straight in 2026, and their recent edge over Utah persists despite roster changes; Utah's home ice keeps it close but Blackhawks finish it.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Chicago Blackhawks win
2–3
62%
Chicago has dominated the recent H2H (4-1), winning the last three meetings. Utah's home advantage is offset by Chicago's strong recent form and scoring consistency against them.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 2–3. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 2–3
    4 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
  • 4–3
    1 model
  • 4–5
    1 model
  • 2–4
    1 model
  • 2–1
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Utah Mammoth vs Chicago Blackhawks in NHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chicago Blackhawks win, with vote shares roughly 20% / 80% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Utah Mammoth vs Chicago Blackhawks, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Chicago Blackhawks

80% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.60 vs 3.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.