BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
Extraliga · Week 8 Oct 2, 2026 · 15:00 Not Started

Trinec
vs
Litvinov.

Quick answer

Who will win Trinec vs Litvinov?

10 of 10 AI models pick Trinec to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 3–2 at 59% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Trinec (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Trinec beat Litvinov in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Trinec win 100%

10 / 10 models

Litvinov win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Trinec win
3–2
62%
Trinec has won four of the last five listed meetings and owns the home-ice advantage. Litvinov’s recent head-to-head win shows this should remain competitive, favoring a narrow, moderate-scoring home victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Trinec win
3–2
58%
Trinec has won 4 of last 5 meetings and holds home-ice advantage; Litvinov has shown capable offense but inconsistent defense.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Trinec win
4–2
66%
Trinec consistently dominates this matchup on home ice with solid defensive structure, while Litvinov often struggles to contain Trinec's transitions in Werk Arena.
04
Grok 4.6
Trinec win
3–2
58%
Trinec won four of five recent H2H, including several tight home games. Week 7 form is thin, so a one-goal home edge at typical Extraliga pace is the best guess.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Trinec win
3–2
58%
Trinec has won four of the last five H2H meetings, including the most recent home game 3-2. Litvinov can score, but Trinec's home edge and consistent edge in this matchup point to a narrow home win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Trinec win
3–2
62%
Trinec won 3 of last 5 H2H including both home meetings; home venue advantage and consistent scoring against Litvinov support a narrow home win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Trinec win
3–2
62%
Trinec holds 4-1 H2H edge in last 5, home venue advantage, consistent finishing.
08
Kimi K3
Trinec win
3–2
58%
Trinec have won three of the last four H2H meetings, mostly by one goal, and home ice in Ostrava keeps the edge; Litvinov's November win shows they can score, so expect a tight, competitive game.
09
GLM 5.3
Trinec win
3–2
58%
Trinec won three of the last five H2H meetings at home with tight margins; home ice and their recent edge over Litvinov support a narrow win.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Trinec win
3–1
62%
Trinec's strong recent H2H record at home (3-2, 3-1, 4-1) and venue advantage suggest a controlled win against an opponent they've consistently outscored at home.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    8 models
  • 3–1
    1 model
  • 4–2
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Trinec vs Litvinov in Extraliga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Trinec win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Trinec vs Litvinov, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Trinec

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.10 vs 1.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.