BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
Liiga Oct 3, 2026 · 14:00 Finished

TPS Turku
vs
JYP.

Quick answer

Who will win TPS Turku vs JYP?

Final score: TPS Turku 4–1 JYP. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick JYP to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–3.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward JYP (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–3 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will TPS Turku beat JYP in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

TPS Turku win 0%

0 / 10 models

JYP win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
JYP win
3–4
62%
JYP won the last four meetings, including two in Turku, while TPS still has home-ice advantage. The recent series suggests a competitive but relatively open game, with JYP’s matchup edge deciding a narrow result.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
JYP win
3–4
58%
JYP has won four of last five meetings including a recent blowout; recent H2H trend and scoring pace favor a close away win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
JYP win
2–3
58%
JYP have dominated recent head-to-head encounters, winning four straight against TPS Turku by consistently finding ways to break down their defensive structure.
04
Grok 4.6
JYP win
2–4
58%
JYP took four of the last five H2H, including 8-3 at Turku. Home ice helps TPS but recent results still favor JYP in a fairly open Liiga game.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
JYP win
2–4
62%
JYP have won four of the last five meetings, including an 8-3 away rout in February, and look comfortable in this matchup despite TPS home ice.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
JYP win
2–3
62%
JYP won three of the last four H2H meetings, including a dominant 8-3 road victory in February. Their recent edge over TPS suggests continued superiority despite venue.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
JYP win
4–5
65%
JYP's recent dominance in H2H and higher scoring trend against TPS Turku; home ice less decisive here.
08
Kimi K3
JYP win
2–4
62%
JYP have won four straight H2H meetings, including 8-3 in Turku last season, showing a clear matchup edge. Expect JYP's attack to outpace TPS again, though not quite a blowout.
09
GLM 5.3
JYP win
3–4
58%
JYP have won the last four head-to-heads, including 8-3 in Turku, suggesting a matchup edge despite roster changes; home venue keeps it close, so a narrow away win fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
JYP win
2–3
60%
JYP has won four of last five H2H meetings, including high-scoring games; TPS Turku's home advantage insufficient against JYP's attack.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 10 models settled on 2–3. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 2–3
    3 models
  • 3–4
    3 models
  • 2–4
    3 models
  • 4–5
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on TPS Turku vs JYP in Liiga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is JYP win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win TPS Turku vs JYP, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors JYP

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.50 vs 3.80

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.