BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
National League · Week 9 Sep 25, 2026 · 17:45 Not Started

Rapperswil-Jona
vs
Davos.

Quick answer

Who will win Rapperswil-Jona vs Davos?

10 of 10 AI models pick Davos to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 3–4 at 59% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Davos (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–4 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Rapperswil-Jona beat Davos in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Rapperswil-Jona win 0%

0 / 10 models

Davos win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Davos win
4–5
62%
Davos have won four of the last five recorded meetings, including both recent 4-3 contests. Rapperswil-Jona’s home ice should keep this Week 5 matchup close, but Davos remain the stronger narrow choice.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Davos win
3–4
56%
Davos have won 3 of last 5 head-to-head meetings, including recent close encounters, suggesting a slight edge in this rivalry despite home venue for Rapperswil-Jona.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Davos win
2–4
62%
Davos consistently finds offensive success against Rapperswil-Jona, controlling the tempo and finishing efficiently in high-pressure road matchups.
04
Grok 4.6
Davos win
3–4
58%
Davos took four of the last five H2H meetings, often by one goal at high pace; thin 2026 week-5 form still favors their edge over Rapperswil-Jona at home.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Davos win
3–4
58%
Davos have won four of the last five H2H meetings, including both most recent games, and consistently outscore Rapperswil-Jona. Expect another close, high-scoring contest with Davos edging it.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Davos win
2–3
62%
Davos won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings, including both visits to Rapperswil-Jona recently. Slight away edge in quality and consistency supports a narrow Davos victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Davos win
4–5
68%
Davos leads 3-2 in recent H2H, including two wins this season; stronger away form and finishing.
08
Kimi K3
Davos win
2–4
62%
Davos has won four of the last five H2H meetings, including a 6-1 blowout, showing consistent superiority over Rapperswil-Jona despite the latter's home advantage.
09
GLM 5.3
Davos win
3–4
55%
Davos won four of the last five H2H meetings, including tight road wins at Rapperswil-Jona; recent head-to-heads are high-scoring one-goal games.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Davos win
3–4
62%
Davos has won three of the last five H2H meetings, including the most recent, and historically scores well against Rapperswil-Jona, suggesting a slight edge in this matchup.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 3–4. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–4
    5 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 2–4
    2 models
  • 2–3
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Rapperswil-Jona vs Davos in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Davos win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Rapperswil-Jona vs Davos, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Davos

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.90 vs 4.10

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.