EXM 1-0 THA · 49% SEA 2-1 REA · 56% AND 0-0 MAL · 52% NET 1-1 GER · 53% SER 1-0 GRE · 54% POR 2-0 WAL · 61% NOR 1-1 DEN · 53% AUS 2-0 ISR · 58% KOS 1-1 REP · 51% LIE 0-1 LIT · 59% BOR 2-1 WER · 63% RBL 2-1 EIN · 62% 189 2-1 HAM · 60% SCF 2-0 FCS · 63% EXM 1-0 THA · 49% SEA 2-1 REA · 56% AND 0-0 MAL · 52% NET 1-1 GER · 53% SER 1-0 GRE · 54% POR 2-0 WAL · 61% NOR 1-1 DEN · 53% AUS 2-0 ISR · 58% KOS 1-1 REP · 51% LIE 0-1 LIT · 59% BOR 2-1 WER · 63% RBL 2-1 EIN · 62% 189 2-1 HAM · 60% SCF 2-0 FCS · 63%
National League · Week 3 Sep 22, 2026 · 17:45 Finished

Langnau Tigers
vs
Lausanne.

Quick answer

Who will win Langnau Tigers vs Lausanne?

Final score: Langnau Tigers 3–5 Lausanne. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Lausanne to win (100%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Lausanne (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 65% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Langnau Tigers beat Lausanne in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Langnau Tigers win 0%

0 / 10 models

Lausanne win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Lausanne win
4–5
68%
Lausanne won all five listed recent meetings, including three in Langnau, while repeatedly generating four or more goals. Early-season uncertainty tempers confidence, but the sustained matchup edge supports an away win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Lausanne win
3–4
58%
Lausanne have won four of the last five meetings, often in high-scoring affairs, suggesting a continued edge despite Langnau's home venue.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Lausanne win
2–4
66%
Lausanne hold a strong head-to-head advantage with superior roster depth and offensive execution, consistently overpowering Langnau's defensive structure home and away.
04
Grok 4.6
Lausanne win
2–4
62%
Lausanne won all five recent H2H meetings, often by multiple goals. Week 4 form is thin, so a moderate away edge at Langnau, not a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Lausanne win
2–4
62%
Lausanne has dominated recent H2H, winning four straight with multiple multi-goal margins; Langnau's home edge hasn't closed that gap.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Lausanne win
2–4
72%
Lausanne dominated all five recent H2H meetings convincingly, including a 4-1 win at Langnau in September 2025. Their offensive output and consistency against this opponent strongly favor an away victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Lausanne win
4–5
68%
Lausanne's consistent H2H dominance and recent form suggest stronger attack; Langnau struggles to contain them.
08
Kimi K3
Lausanne win
2–4
68%
Lausanne has won the last five H2H meetings, scoring 4+ goals in four of them; Langnau's defense consistently struggles against Lausanne's pace, making an away win with multi-goal margin the likely outcome.
09
GLM 5.3
Lausanne win
2–4
62%
Lausanne have won all five recent meetings with Langnau, scoring freely (4, 6, 2, 4, 6), so despite home ice their attacking depth should edge a moderately open game.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Lausanne win
2–4
68%
Lausanne dominated the recent H2H, winning the last five meetings, and their attacking style often overwhelms Langnau's defense.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

7 of 10 models settled on 2–4. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–4
    7 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 3–4
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Langnau Tigers vs Lausanne in National League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Lausanne win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Langnau Tigers vs Lausanne, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Lausanne

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 65% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.50 vs 4.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.