BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45% BOR 2-1 WER · 52% RBL 2-1 EIN · 51% 189 2-1 HAM · 48% SCF 2-0 FCS · 54% FCA 1-3 BAY · 56% FSV 1-2 BAY · 47% UNI 2-0 SVE · 51% 1.F 2-2 BOR · 43% SCP 1-2 VFB · 45% LIV 1-1 MAN · 44% ARS 3-0 LEE · 60% CHE 2-1 BOU · 47% MAN 2-1 TOT · 45% AST 2-1 BRE · 45%
Liiga Sep 27, 2026 · 12:00 Finished

Ilves
vs
TPS Turku.

Quick answer

Who will win Ilves vs TPS Turku?

Final score: Ilves 3–2 TPS Turku. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Ilves to win (100%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 3–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (269 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Ilves (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Ilves beat TPS Turku in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Ilves win 100%

10 / 10 models

TPS Turku win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Ilves win
3–2
61%
Ilves have won four of the last five meetings, including a 5-2 home result, giving them a meaningful venue and matchup edge. TPS have shown enough scoring threat to keep this a close, moderate-scoring game.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Ilves win
4–3
58%
Ilves have won 3 of last 5 head-to-head meetings including the most recent, with home venue edge in Tampere; recent games between them have been high-scoring and close.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Ilves win
4–2
62%
Ilves consistently leverage their home ice advantage against TPS, maintaining superior offensive depth and converting at high rates in Tampere.
04
Grok 4.6
Ilves win
3–2
58%
Ilves won four of five recent H2H, including 5-2 at home. Liiga games stay tight; home ice favors a one-goal Ilves edge rather than a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Ilves win
3–2
62%
Ilves have won four of the last five meetings, including a 5-2 home victory in January. Home ice and recent head-to-head edge support a narrow win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Ilves win
3–2
62%
Ilves won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings including a dominant 5-2 at home; home ice and recent head-to-head edge favor them in a close contest.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Ilves win
4–3
62%
Ilves hold 4-1-1 H2H edge this season; home ice and recent finishing favor them in a tight, high-paced Liiga matchup.
08
Kimi K3
Ilves win
4–2
62%
Ilves have won four of the last five H2H meetings, including the most recent 5-2 home win, and typically control this matchup at home. TPS can score but concede too much against Ilves' pace.
09
GLM 5.3
Ilves win
4–2
60%
Ilves won four of the last five H2H meetings, including a 5-2 home win over TPS; home venue supports Ilves, though TPS can score, so a two-goal margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Ilves win
3–2
58%
Ilves won the most recent H2H decisively (5-2) and historically have a slight home edge; expect a close, competitive game with both teams scoring.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    5 models
  • 4–2
    3 models
  • 4–3
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Ilves vs TPS Turku in Liiga? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Ilves win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Ilves vs TPS Turku, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Ilves

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.50 vs 2.20

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.