SEA 2-1 REA · 56% AND 0-0 MAL · 52% NET 1-1 GER · 53% SER 1-0 GRE · 54% POR 2-0 WAL · 61% NOR 1-1 DEN · 53% AUS 2-0 ISR · 58% KOS 1-1 REP · 51% LIE 0-1 LIT · 59% BOR 2-1 WER · 63% RBL 2-1 EIN · 62% 189 2-1 HAM · 60% SCF 2-0 FCS · 63% FCA 1-3 BAY · 64% SEA 2-1 REA · 56% AND 0-0 MAL · 52% NET 1-1 GER · 53% SER 1-0 GRE · 54% POR 2-0 WAL · 61% NOR 1-1 DEN · 53% AUS 2-0 ISR · 58% KOS 1-1 REP · 51% LIE 0-1 LIT · 59% BOR 2-1 WER · 63% RBL 2-1 EIN · 62% 189 2-1 HAM · 60% SCF 2-0 FCS · 63% FCA 1-3 BAY · 64%
SHL · Week 2 Sep 19, 2026 · 16:00 Finished

Farjestad
vs
Orebro.

Quick answer

Who will win Farjestad vs Orebro?

Final score: Farjestad 7–0 Orebro. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Farjestad to win (100%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Farjestad (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–2 at 58% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Farjestad beat Orebro in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Farjestad win 100%

10 / 10 models

Orebro win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Farjestad win
3–2
57%
Farjestad's strong recent head-to-head record and home ice provide a narrow edge, while Orebro's latest 3-2 win signals a competitive matchup. A close, moderate-scoring opener is most likely.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Farjestad win
3–2
55%
Farjestad won 4 of last 5 meetings including home venue, and season opener favors home ice; expect a tight, competitive result.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Farjestad win
3–2
63%
Farjestad historically hold the upper hand in this rivalry and possess superior offensive depth at home to edge a tight season opener.
04
Grok 4.6
Farjestad win
3–2
58%
Farjestad won four of five recent H2H meetings and has home ice in SHL Week 1; Orebro’s August win is treated as preseason noise, so a one-goal home edge fits.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Farjestad win
3–2
58%
Farjestad have won three of the last five H2H meetings and hold home ice; Orebro's recent 3-2 win was close, so a one-goal margin fits.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Farjestad win
3–2
58%
Farjestad won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings and have home advantage in this season opener, though Orebro's recent 3-2 win shows they remain competitive.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Farjestad win
3–2
60%
Farjestad holds home advantage and recent H2H edge; Orebro’s narrow wins lack consistency.
08
Kimi K3
Farjestad win
3–2
54%
Historically tight divisional matchup with four of five recent meetings decided by one goal; Farjestad holds slight home-edge following Orebro's last visit win.
09
GLM 5.3
Farjestad win
3–2
58%
Farjestad won four of the last five H2H meetings and Orebro's last visit ended 0-3; home venue edge in Karlstad supports a narrow Farjestad win in a tight, low-scoring SHL opener.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Farjestad win
3–2
58%
Home advantage and recent H2H dominance (4-1) favor Farjestad, but Orebro's last win shows they can compete; expect a close, high-tempo game.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

10 of 10 models settled on 3–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–2
    10 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Farjestad vs Orebro in SHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Farjestad win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Farjestad vs Orebro, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Farjestad

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 58% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.00 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.