UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60% UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60%
KHL Sep 9, 2026 · 14:00 Finished

Barys Astana
vs
Salavat Ufa.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Salavat Ufa (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–4 at 64% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Barys Astana win 0%

0 / 10 models

Salavat Ufa win 100%

10 / 10 models

Advertisement
— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Salavat Ufa win
3–4
68%
Salavat Ufa won the latest three meetings, including a 4-1 result in August, indicating a meaningful matchup edge. Barys Astana’s home venue should help, but Salavat’s defensive control supports an away victory by two goals.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Salavat Ufa win
2–3
58%
Salavat Ufa has won four of the last five meetings, including a recent 4-1 road win, showing a clear edge over Barys Astana.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Salavat Ufa win
2–4
68%
Salavat Ufa has dominated recent head-to-head encounters against Barys Astana, boasting superior offensive depth and defensive structure.
04
Grok 4.6
Salavat Ufa win
2–3
58%
Salavat took four of five H2H, including 4-1 in August. Barys home meetings were one-goal games, so a close 2-3 away win fits early-season KHL travel.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Salavat Ufa win
3–4
63%
Salavat Ufa have won four of the last five meetings, including 4-1 in August; Barys's home edge keeps it close but Ufa's superior attack should control.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Salavat Ufa win
1–3
68%
Salavat Ufa dominated recent H2H (4 wins in last 5), including a 4-1 win just three weeks ago. Barys Astana's lone home win was narrow; Ufa's attacking edge persists.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Salavat Ufa win
1–2
65%
Recent form favors Salavat; home matches typically low-scoring.
08
Kimi K3
Salavat Ufa win
2–4
68%
Salavat Ufa has won four of the last five meetings, including 4-1 and 3-1 wins over Barys; their superior attack should prevail again despite Barys home ice.
09
GLM 5.3
Salavat Ufa win
2–4
62%
Salavat Ufa have won four of the last five meetings, including 4-1 in August; their deeper attack should outscore Barys at home.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Salavat Ufa win
1–3
65%
Salavat Ufa has won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings, including a 4-1 away loss for Barys Astana last month; their recent dominance outweighs home advantage.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 10 models settled on 2–4. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 2–4
    3 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
  • 2–3
    2 models
  • 1–3
    2 models
  • 1–2
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Barys Astana vs Salavat Ufa in KHL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 4; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Salavat Ufa win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 100% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Barys Astana vs Salavat Ufa, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Salavat Ufa

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 64% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.90 vs 3.40

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Advertisement

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

Compare their answers, read the reasoning, and see where they disagree. Try one question free each day.