UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60% UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60%
Champions League · Week 1 Sep 9, 2026 · 16:45 Finished

RK Zagreb
vs
Celje.

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward RK Zagreb (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 31–28 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

RK Zagreb win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Celje win 0%

0 / 10 models

Advertisement
— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
RK Zagreb win
32–30
53%
RK Zagreb’s home advantage supports a narrow opening-round win in what should be an attacking matchup. Their 34-31 victory over Celje offers modest support, though the older meeting and limited current-form context keep confidence moderate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
RK Zagreb win
29–26
58%
Zagreb historically strong at home in this fixture and Champions League opener; Celje competitive but away disadvantage tips a close, high-scoring home win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
RK Zagreb win
29–26
62%
RK Zagreb generally controls the tempo at home with solid defensive physical presence against regional rivals Celje, securing a hard-fought three-goal opening round victory.
04
Grok 4.6
RK Zagreb win
31–28
55%
Zagreb are stronger at home in Champions League; Celje score but usually concede more away. Week 1 form is thin, so a 31-28 home win fits tempo better than copying the old 34-31.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
RK Zagreb win
31–28
48%
Zagreb's home edge and prior high-scoring H2H win support a narrow home victory; Celje can stay close but fall short.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
RK Zagreb win
31–28
58%
Zagreb won the last H2H 34-31 at home; similar high-tempo pattern expected with home advantage in Champions League opener.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
RK Zagreb win
30–27
62%
Zagreb’s home edge and recent H2H win suggest narrow home victory; both offenses typically score well.
08
Kimi K3
RK Zagreb win
31–28
56%
Regional CL derby; only H2H (Zagreb 34-31, 2023) suggests high tempo and Zagreb home edge still applies, but thin current form data keeps confidence moderate.
09
GLM 5.3
RK Zagreb win
31–28
58%
Zagreb won the only recent H2H 34-31 at home; CL home venue edge and stronger squad depth should decide a high-tempo open game.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
RK Zagreb win
30–27
55%
Last H2H was high-scoring (34-31); Zagreb's home advantage and early-season context suggest a close win, but form uncertainty limits confidence.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 31–28. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 31–28
    5 models
  • 29–26
    2 models
  • 30–27
    2 models
  • 32–30
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on RK Zagreb vs Celje in Champions League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (31 - 28; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is RK Zagreb win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win RK Zagreb vs Celje, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors RK Zagreb

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 30.50 vs 27.60

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Advertisement

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

Compare their answers, read the reasoning, and see where they disagree. Try one question free each day.