GEN 1-0 FRO · 56% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 56% SCF 2-1 BOR · 58% FCA 1-2 BAY · 59% FSV 1-1 EIN · 56% CHE 2-0 HUL · 65% LIV 2-1 FUL · 64% AST 2-1 NOT · 60% BOU 1-1 BRE · 56% CRY 1-0 IPS · 59% STR 2-1 MON · 56% SAS 1-2 JUV · 59% TOT 2-1 EVE · 59% GEN 1-0 FRO · 56% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 56% SCF 2-1 BOR · 58% FCA 1-2 BAY · 59% FSV 1-1 EIN · 56% CHE 2-0 HUL · 65% LIV 2-1 FUL · 64% AST 2-1 NOT · 60% BOU 1-1 BRE · 56% CRY 1-0 IPS · 59% STR 2-1 MON · 56% SAS 1-2 JUV · 59% TOT 2-1 EVE · 59%
UEFA Champions League · League Stage - 1 Jul 21, 2026 · 18:30 · UTC Merkur Arena, Graz Match Finished · 90'

Sturm Graz
vs
Heart Of Midlothian.

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Sturm Graz (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 59% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Sturm Graz beat Heart Of Midlothian in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Sturm Graz win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Heart Of Midlothian win 0%

0 / 10 models

Advertisement
— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Sturm Graz win
2–1
60%
Sturm Graz has home advantage at Merkur-Arena and likely better squad depth, giving them a slight edge.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Sturm Graz win
2–1
56%
Sturm Graz's Champions League qualifying experience and home advantage at Merkur-Arena should edge a competitive Hearts side in a tight, close contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Sturm Graz win
2–0
60%
Sturm Graz have a strong home advantage and generally more European experience. Hearts may struggle away in Austria, making a solid home win likely.
04
Grok 4.6
Sturm Graz win
2–0
58%
Sturm Graz hold clear home edge at Merkur-Arena against Hearts in a Champions League qualifier with limited prior meetings.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Sturm Graz win
2–1
65%
Sturm Graz's home advantage and stronger recent form edge a tight contest.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Sturm Graz win
1–0
60%
Sturm Graz has home advantage and a strong defensive record, while Heart of Midlothian may struggle to score away from home.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Sturm Graz win
2–1
60%
Sturm Graz’s home form and attacking strength edge Heart of Midlothian’s resilience; narrow win likely.
08
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Sturm Graz win
2–1
58%
Sturm Graz's home advantage and slightly better form give them an edge; Heart Of Midlothian may score but struggle to contain the hosts.
09
Cohere Command R+ (08-2024)
Sturm Graz win
1–0
58%
Graz's strong home form and defensive record should edge a tight, low-scoring affair. Hearts may struggle to find the net against a solid home defence.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Sturm Graz win
1–0
55%
Sturm Graz's home venue in a UEFA Champions League qualifier suggests a tight, defensive match with a narrow home win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–1
    5 models
  • 1–0
    3 models
  • 2–0
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Sturm Graz vs Heart Of Midlothian in UEFA Champions League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Sturm Graz win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Sturm Graz vs Heart Of Midlothian, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Sturm Graz

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 59% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.70 vs 0.50

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Sturm Graz win · AI Sturm Graz win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Sturm Graz
Last 5
L W W
6 GF · 1 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Fenerbahçe 0-1 L
  • Heart Of Midlothian 0-2 W
  • Heart Of Midlothian 4-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Heart Of Midlothian
Last 5
W D L L L
5 GF · 13 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Stenhousemuir 0-3 W
  • Benfica 1-1 D
  • Benfica 6-1 L
  • Sturm Graz 0-2 L
  • Sturm Graz 4-0 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

STU 2 · D 0 · HEA 0

HEA VS STU
0-2
AWAY WIN
Jul 28, 2026
STU VS HEA
4-0
HOME WIN
Jul 21, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with Sturm Graz, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight UEFA Champions League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Sturm Graz
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Heart Of Midlothian
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.20 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.5 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Sturm Graz is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.20 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Sturm Graz win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Advertisement

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.