St. Truiden
vs
Brann.
Quick answer
Who will win St. Truiden vs Brann?
4 of 10 AI models pick Brann to win (40%). A draw is in play: 4 of 10 models picked it. The mean predicted score is 1–1 at 46% average confidence (medium).
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Brann (4 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–1 at 46% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
2 / 10 models
4 / 10 models
4 / 10 models
10 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
4 of 10 models settled on 1–1. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.
-
1–1
4 models
-
1–2
4 models
-
1–0
2 models
Bookmakers vs the AI panel
Bet365 · 1.70 / 4.00 / 4.10Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 11 AI models picking each result.
Predicted lineups: St. Truiden vs Brann
Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.
St. Truiden
Brann
Eirik Horneland
- 12 S. Nilsen
- 2 L. Cornic
- 3 F. Knudsen
- 21 N. Kasanwirjo
- 20 V. Dragsnes
- 10 K. M. Ingason
- 25 N. Wassberg
- 16 K. Eriksen
- 22 S. Magnusson
- 11 B. Finne
- 9 N. Castro
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in St. Truiden's and Brann's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
St. Truiden (at home)
W
W
L
W
L
W
D
W
W
L
|
Brann (away)
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
60%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
43%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
| Drew |
10%
All games 0% (0/10)
|
0%
All games 0% (0/10)
|
| Over 1.5 goals |
90%
All games 90% (9/10)
|
100%
All games 100% (10/10)
|
| Over 2.5 goals |
50%
All games 60% (6/10)
|
71%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
| Over 3.5 goals |
20%
All games 50% (5/10)
|
43%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
| Both teams scored |
40%
All games 40% (4/10)
|
71%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
| Scored |
80%
All games 70% (7/10)
|
86%
All games 80% (8/10)
|
| Clean sheet |
40%
All games 30% (3/10)
|
14%
All games 10% (1/10)
|
| Over 9.5 corners |
60%
All games 33% (2/6)
|
– |
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
40%
All games 33% (2/6)
|
– |
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
UEFA Europa Conference League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
St. Truiden
- W-D-L
- 2-0-0
- Goals
- 3-0
- Clean sheets
- 2
- Failed to score
- 0
- Best win run
- 2
- Penalties
- 0/0
Brann
4-3-3- W-D-L
- 5-2-1
- Goals
- 19-11
- Clean sheets
- 0
- Failed to score
- 1
- Best win run
- 1
- Penalties
- 2/2
Key players · St. Truiden
- No player in the competition's top scorers or assisters.
Key players · Brann
-
N. Holm
3 G · 0 A · 7 apps
Top scorers · UEFA Europa Conference League
- 1 K. Behrens FC Lugano 7
- 2 Winsley Boteli Mokango FC Sion 7
- 3 C. Dessers Panathinaikos 6
- 4 A. Cornelius FC Copenhagen 5
- 5 D. Klaassen Ajax 5
What’s moving the panel.
40% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 46% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Form, history, team news.
- Club Brugge KV 3-2 L
- FC Midtjylland 0-1 W
- Lommel United 4-1 W
- FC Iberia 1999 2-0 W
- KV Mechelen 4-3 L
No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.
- Grorud 0-2 W
- Lillestrom 3-2 L
- Kauno Žalgiris 1-4 W
- Valerenga 3-1 L
- Lincoln Red Imps FC 2-1 W
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 20% of models side with St. Truiden, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 40% — tight UEFA Europa Conference League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 2.20 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.5 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When St. Truiden is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 2.20 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Brann win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on St. Truiden vs Brann in UEFA Europa Conference League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Brann win, with vote shares roughly 20% / 40% / 40% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win St. Truiden vs Brann, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
- Top predictions today →
- UEFA Europa Conference League predictions hub →
- Finished matches & archive →
Related matches
- Aarhus vs SC Braga UEFA Europa Conference League
- Atalanta vs Kairat Almaty UEFA Europa Conference League
- FK Crvena Zvezda vs Inter Club d'Escaldes UEFA Europa Conference League
- KuPS vs Gent UEFA Europa Conference League
- Lincoln Red Imps FC vs HNK Hajduk Split UEFA Europa Conference League
- FC Midtjylland vs Ajax UEFA Europa Conference League
- Mjallby AIF vs Borac Banja Luka UEFA Europa Conference League
- FC Thun vs Heart Of Midlothian UEFA Europa Conference League
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Le Havre vs Paris Saint Germain prediction: AI panel unanimously backs PSG in Ligue 1. See consensus, score picks and confidence for Friday's clash.
Manchester City vs Brighton prediction for their Premier League clash. The AI panel unanimously backs a narrow City win with both teams scoring.
Vegas Golden Knights vs New Jersey Devils prediction: the AI panel unanimously backs Vegas in this NHL clash, with a 3-2 scoreline and 58% confidence.
Levante vs Atletico Madrid prediction for their La Liga clash. The AI panel unanimously backs an Atletico win, with a clean sheet the most likely outcome.
Read our Chelsea vs Manchester United prediction for the Premier League clash at Stamford Bridge. The AI panel unanimously backs a narrow home win.
Gremio vs Atletico Paranaense prediction for the Serie A clash, with the AI panel's consensus, most common score and a clear winner at Arena do Grêmio.
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.
You've used today's 3 free matches
Get the free app to see the AI picks for every match, follow your teams and get the picks before kickoff.
Get the free app Back to today's matches