MON 1-1 CAG · 38% PAR 1-1 TOR · 39% TOT 2-0 COV · 54% GET 1-1 RAY · 38% FEN 2-1 SLA · 45% SAB 0-3 BOR · 66% LIV 2-0 VIL · 51% MAN 3-0 AEK · 65% PAR 2-1 BAR · 44% VFB 0-1 ATL · 42% ASR 2-0 SLO · 58% FCP 2-1 PSV · 43% NAP 2-0 BOD · 54% COM 1-2 MAN · 46% MON 1-1 CAG · 38% PAR 1-1 TOR · 39% TOT 2-0 COV · 54% GET 1-1 RAY · 38% FEN 2-1 SLA · 45% SAB 0-3 BOR · 66% LIV 2-0 VIL · 51% MAN 3-0 AEK · 65% PAR 2-1 BAR · 44% VFB 0-1 ATL · 42% ASR 2-0 SLO · 58% FCP 2-1 PSV · 43% NAP 2-0 BOD · 54% COM 1-2 MAN · 46%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 34 Oct 18, 2026 · 02:30 · UTC Avaya Stadium, San Jose Match Finished · 90'

San Jose Earthquakes
vs
Nashville SC.

Quick answer

Who will win San Jose Earthquakes vs Nashville SC?

Final score: San Jose Earthquakes 1–1 Nashville SC. Before kickoff, 5 of 10 AI models expect a draw (50%); the consensus was right. The AI predicted score was 1–1.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → San Jose Earthquakes form Nashville SC form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward the draw (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–1 at 39% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will San Jose Earthquakes beat Nashville SC in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

San Jose Earthquakes win 40%

4 / 10 models

Draw 50%

5 / 10 models

Nashville SC win 10%

1 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Draw
1–1
29%
No form, roster, or head-to-head data is available, so the forecast is necessarily cautious. San Jose’s home advantage is balanced by Nashville’s likely defensive organization, making a low-scoring draw the best estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
San Jose Earthquakes win
2–1
46%
Late-season MLS home fixture with no strong H2H signal; slight home edge from venue, but limited form data keeps confidence moderate.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
1–1
51%
Nashville SC's disciplined, compact defensive structure should neutralize San Jose's home attack, pointing toward a balanced, low-scoring draw.
04
Grok 4.6
Draw
1–1
38%
No H2H or 2026 form given; MLS late-season games at Avaya often stay tight. Even contest points to a low 1-1 rather than a clear home or away edge.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Draw
1–1
48%
No H2H form to lean on; both MLS sides often cancel out in regular-season road/home splits. San Jose's home edge is modest, Nashville typically compact away, making a low-scoring draw the most balanced single line.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Nashville SC win
0–1
42%
Nashville's historically disciplined defensive structure tends to frustrate San Jose, who have struggled for consistency; low-scoring away edge fits their profile.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Draw
1–1
55%
Limited H2H data; both teams mid-table with balanced records. Avaya Stadium often sees tight, low-scoring games.
08
Kimi K3
San Jose Earthquakes win
2–1
52%
No H2H data available; San Jose's home advantage at Avaya Stadium and Nashville's cross-country travel tilt a tight, open MLS contest toward the hosts.
09
GLM 5.3
San Jose Earthquakes win
2–1
50%
No H2H or form data available; San Jose get modest home edge at Avaya Stadium. Nashville typically compact, so a narrow home win fits, but evidence is thin.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
San Jose Earthquakes win
1–0
55%
MLS home advantage and base rates favor San Jose; thin context suggests a tight, low-scoring match.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 1–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–1
    5 models
  • 2–1
    3 models
  • 1–0
    1 model
  • 0–1
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on San Jose Earthquakes vs Nashville SC in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Draw, with vote shares roughly 40% / 50% / 10% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win San Jose Earthquakes vs Nashville SC, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Models lean the draw

50% of models take a stalemate — cross-check score frequency and 1X2 strip before sizing.

02
Low confidence

Mean 39% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.20 vs 0.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Draw · AI Draw

1X2: Miss Score: Exact
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

San Jose Earthquakes
#4 · 48 PTS · GD +10
Last 5
D D D W W
7 GF · 4 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Nashville SC 1-1 D
  • Real Salt Lake 1-1 D
  • Colorado Rapids 1-1 D
  • Portland Timbers 3-1 W
  • Houston Dynamo 1-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Nashville SC
#1 · 67 PTS · GD +41
Last 5
D W W W W
14 GF · 2 GA
Recent fixtures
  • San Jose Earthquakes 1-1 D
  • Sporting Kansas City 4-0 W
  • Austin 1-4 W
  • Toronto FC 2-0 W
  • Chicago Fire 3-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

SAN 0 · D 1 · NAS 0

SAN VS NAS
1-1
DRAW
Oct 18, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 40% of models side with San Jose Earthquakes, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 50% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

San Jose Earthquakes
~40%
implied lean
Draw
~50%
implied lean
Nashville SC
~10%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.10 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.4 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When San Jose Earthquakes is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.10 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Draw. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.