FLA 2-0 IND · 60% ATL 1-0 CIE · 53% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51% FLA 2-0 IND · 60% ATL 1-0 CIE · 53% UTA 1-1 SEP · 51% WID 1-0 WIE · 54% SPV 1-0 1.F · 52% VFL 2-0 SVD · 58% KAS 1-1 KON · 50% LYN 1-2 SIL · 52% SAR 2-1 KFU · 55% RAP 2-0 WSG · 60% ANN 1-0 DIJ · 51% GRE 1-1 CLE · 52% LAV 1-0 SOC · 52% PAU 1-1 DUN · 51%
UEFA Europa League · League Stage - 1 Sep 17, 2026 · 19:00 · UTC Doosan Arena, Plzen Match Finished · 90'

Plzen
vs
Union St. Gilloise.

Quick answer

Who will win Plzen vs Union St. Gilloise?

Final score: Plzen 0–3 Union St. Gilloise. Before kickoff, 6 of 10 AI models expect a draw (60%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Plzen form Union St. Gilloise form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward the draw (6 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–1 at 51% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Plzen beat Union St. Gilloise in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Plzen win 40%

4 / 10 models

Draw 60%

6 / 10 models

Union St. Gilloise win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Draw
1–1
36%
With no form or head-to-head data available, Plzen’s Doosan Arena advantage is balanced by Union St. Gilloise’s strong recent European profile; a cautious, evenly matched opener most likely produces one goal each.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Plzen win
2–1
50%
Plzen strong at Doosan Arena in European nights; Union St. Gilloise capable away but likely concede at least once against a solid host attack.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
1–1
55%
Plzen are resilient defensively at home in European competition, while Union St. Gilloise possess enough organized transitional threat to balance the match in a tight tactical opening fixture.
04
Grok 4.6
Plzen win
1–0
48%
No H2H or form given. Plzen’s Doosan Arena Europa home edge points to a tight, low-scoring opener rather than an open game.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Draw
1–1
52%
Opening league-stage match at Doosan Arena likely tight; Plzen's home resilience offsets Union SG's sharper attack, making a low-scoring draw the best exact-score call.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Draw
1–1
58%
First Europa League league-stage meeting with no H2H history; Plzen's home solidity at Doosan Arena balanced by Union SG's organized away structure suggests a tight, low-scoring draw.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Draw
1–1
55%
First group stage match; both teams balanced, home edge slight but not decisive; tight game expected.
08
Kimi K3
Draw
1–1
48%
No H2H data and thin form context; Union SG have strong European pedigree but Plzen are tough at Doosan Arena, so a tight, low-scoring draw is the calibrated call.
09
GLM 5.3
Plzen win
1–0
52%
Plzen are strong at Doosan Arena in European ties, while Union St. Gilloise often start league stages cautiously away; a tight, low-scoring home win fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Plzen win
2–1
60%
Home advantage in a European opener likely gives Plzen an edge; expect a competitive match with both teams likely to score.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 1–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–1
    6 models
  • 2–1
    2 models
  • 1–0
    2 models

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Plzen vs Union St. Gilloise in UEFA Europa League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Draw, with vote shares roughly 40% / 60% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Plzen vs Union St. Gilloise, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Models lean the draw

60% of models take a stalemate — cross-check score frequency and 1X2 strip before sizing.

02
Low confidence

Mean 51% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.20 vs 0.80

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Union St. Gilloise win · AI Draw

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Plzen
Last 5
L L W L
7 GF · 10 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Union St. Gilloise 0-3 L
  • Sigma Olomouc 2-3 L
  • FK Crvena Zvezda 5-1 W
  • FK Crvena Zvezda 3-0 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Union St. Gilloise
Last 5
W W L D W
18 GF · 7 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Plzen 0-3 W
  • Lommel United 5-0 W
  • Bodo/Glimt 3-2 L
  • Bodo/Glimt 3-3 D
  • Anderlecht 5-1 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

PLZ 0 · D 0 · UNI 1

PLZ VS UNI
0-3
AWAY WIN
Sep 17, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 40% of models side with Plzen, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 60% — tight UEFA Europa League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Plzen
~40%
implied lean
Draw
~60%
implied lean
Union St. Gilloise
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Plzen is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Draw. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.