ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66% ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66%
Premier League · Regular Season - 9 May 9, 2026 · 11:30 · UTC Anfield, Liverpool Match Finished · 90'

Liverpool
vs
Chelsea.

Quick answer

Who will win Liverpool vs Chelsea?

Final score: Liverpool 1–1 Chelsea. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Liverpool to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 3–1.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Liverpool form Chelsea form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (751 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Liverpool (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 3–1 at 51% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Premier League table Where Liverpool and Chelsea stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Liverpool win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Chelsea win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Liverpool win
3–1
68%
Liverpool's strong home form at Anfield and recent solid attack give them the edge against Chelsea's inconsistent defense.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Liverpool win
3–1
55%
Anfield in Round 36 with Liverpool needing points; Chelsea conceded in all five recent H2H meetings including 3-1 and 4-1 losses at this venue, suggesting Liverpool's attack consistently penetrates Chelsea's defence at home.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Liverpool win
3–1
60%
Liverpool's formidable Anfield record late in the season gives them the edge. Expecting an open game where Chelsea scores but Liverpool's attack ultimately overwhelms them.
04
Grok 4.6
Liverpool win
3–1
68%
Liverpool's strong Anfield record and recent 4-1 win over Chelsea at home suggest dominance; Chelsea's away form falters.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Liverpool win
3–1
62%
Liverpool’s strong home form at Anfield and Chelsea’s recent defensive vulnerabilities support a comfortable home win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Liverpool win
3–1
62%
Liverpool's strong home form and recent history of winning at Anfield support a home win. Chelsea's away form is less consistent.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Liverpool win
2–1
62%
Anfield advantage and Liverpool’s superior attacking form; Chelsea’s defensive frailties in recent H2H suggest a narrow home win.
08
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Liverpool win
3–1
62%
Liverpool's strong home form and Chelsea's recent struggles on the road support a home win; Liverpool's attacking depth should create scoring opportunities.
09
Cohere Command R+ (08-2024)
Liverpool win
3–1
72%
Liverpool's strong home form and Anfield advantage, along with Chelsea's recent away struggles, point to a comfortable home win.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Liverpool win
4–1
60%
Liverpool's strong home record at Anfield includes a 4-1 win over Chelsea in 2024, suggesting a high-scoring home victory.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 3–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 3–1
    8 models
  • 2–1
    1 model
  • 4–1
    1 model

Season data

Premier League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Liverpool

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
4-3-1
Goals
11-8
Clean sheets
4
Failed to score
2
Best win run
1
Penalties
1/1
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Chelsea

3-4-2-1
W-D-L
4-1-3
Goals
17-15
Clean sheets
1
Failed to score
2
Best win run
2
Penalties
0/0
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Liverpool

  • A. Isak 6 G · 0 A · 7 apps
  • C. Gakpo 1 G · 3 A · 6 apps

Key players · Chelsea

  • João Pedro 5 G · 3 A · 6 apps
  • M. Rogers 4 G · 1 A · 8 apps
  • C. Palmer 2 G · 3 A · 8 apps

Top scorers · Premier League

  1. 1 E. Haaland Manchester City 9
  2. 2 A. Isak Liverpool 6
  3. 3 João Pedro Chelsea 5
  4. 4 M. Tavernier Bournemouth 5
  5. 5 R. Cherki Manchester City 4
Venue Anfield, Liverpool
Referee Craig Pawson
New at Liverpool L. Kiaba Mounganga (Genk), B. Barcola (Paris Saint Germain), R. Araújo (Barcelona)
New at Chelsea E. Martínez (Aston Villa), D. Satpaev (Kairat Almaty), Pep Chavarría (Rayo Vallecano)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Liverpool

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 51% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 3.00 vs 1.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric Liverpool Chelsea Expected total Lean
Corners 5.8 5.6 11.3 Under 11.5 54% Ask AI
Yellow cards 1.1 2.3 3.4 Under 3.5 55% Ask AI
Shots 16.2 11.6 27.8 Over 27.5 51% Ask AI
Shots on target 5.0 4.3 9.3 Under 9.5 54% Ask AI

Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

Result check

Actual Draw · AI Liverpool win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Liverpool
#4 · 15 PTS · GD +3
Last 5
D W W W W
15 GF · 8 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Chelsea 1-1 D
  • Brighton 2-0 W
  • Villarreal 4-3 W
  • Brentford 1-2 W
  • Lask Linz 3-6 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Chelsea
#5 · 13 PTS · GD +2
Last 5
D L W W L
8 GF · 7 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Liverpool 1-1 D
  • Tottenham 0-2 L
  • Everton 0-2 W
  • Bournemouth 5-1 W
  • Brentford 3-0 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

LIV 1 · D 2 · CHE 2

LIV VS CHE
1-1
DRAW
Oct 28, 2026
LIV VS CHE
1-1
DRAW
May 9, 2026
CHE VS LIV
2-1
HOME WIN
Oct 4, 2025
CHE VS LIV
3-1
HOME WIN
May 4, 2025
LIV VS CHE
2-1
HOME WIN
Oct 20, 2024

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with Liverpool, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Premier League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Liverpool
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Chelsea
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 4.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 4.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Liverpool is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 4.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Liverpool win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Liverpool vs Chelsea in Premier League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (3 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Liverpool win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Liverpool vs Chelsea, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.