EIN 2-1 1.F · 49% LEM 1-2 TOU · 44% FRO 1-1 SAS · 42% DEP 1-1 LEV · 44% EVE 1-2 CHE · 46% ESP 1-2 ATL · 48% VEN 0-2 NAP · 54% BAY 2-1 SCF · 49% UNI 0-2 BOR · 51% BOR 2-1 189 · 45% HAM 1-2 VFB · 47% WER 2-1 SCP · 48% FCS 1-0 FSV · 44% SVE 1-2 FCA · 47% EIN 2-1 1.F · 49% LEM 1-2 TOU · 44% FRO 1-1 SAS · 42% DEP 1-1 LEV · 44% EVE 1-2 CHE · 46% ESP 1-2 ATL · 48% VEN 0-2 NAP · 54% BAY 2-1 SCF · 49% UNI 0-2 BOR · 51% BOR 2-1 189 · 45% HAM 1-2 VFB · 47% WER 2-1 SCP · 48% FCS 1-0 FSV · 44% SVE 1-2 FCA · 47%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 30 Oct 14, 2026 · 23:30 · UTC TQL Stadium, Cincinnati Match Finished · 90'

FC Cincinnati
vs
New England Revolution.

Quick answer

Who will win FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution?

Final score: FC Cincinnati 2–3 New England Revolution. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick FC Cincinnati to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 2–1.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → FC Cincinnati form New England Revolution form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (511 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward FC Cincinnati (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 44% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will FC Cincinnati beat New England Revolution in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

FC Cincinnati win 100%

10 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

New England Revolution win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
56%
With no form or head-to-head data available, Cincinnati’s TQL Stadium advantage is the clearest signal. MLS scoring volatility supports both teams contributing, but the home side is marginally likelier to edge an open match.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
50%
Cincinnati's home strength at TQL Stadium and typically stronger roster give an edge over a weaker Revolution side late in the season.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
FC Cincinnati win
2–0
58%
FC Cincinnati hold strong home dominance at TQL Stadium, while New England often struggles defensively in tough road environments.
04
Grok 4.6
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
52%
No 2026 form or H2H in the feed. Cincinnati are usually solid at TQL; Revolution are a weaker road side, so a narrow home win is the best guess.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
52%
Cincinnati's home form at TQL Stadium is strong, while New England often concedes on the road. Expect a narrow home win with both sides scoring.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
48%
Cincinnati strong at TQL Stadium; limited form data available but home advantage and squad quality edge favors a narrow home win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
58%
Cincinnati's home form and attacking depth edge New England's inconsistent away defense.
08
Kimi K3
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
52%
Cincinnati's home edge at TQL Stadium and typically stronger recent MLS form versus a weaker-traveling New England side; no H2H data available, so moderate confidence on a narrow home win.
09
GLM 5.3
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
52%
Cincinnati are strong at TQL Stadium and typically edge open home games; New England can score but concede on the road, so 2-1 fits despite thin data.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
FC Cincinnati win
2–1
52%
TQL Stadium gives Cincinnati a real home edge and their attack generally creates enough to edge a New England side that travels inconsistently; no H2H data, so moderate confidence.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

9 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–1
    9 models
  • 2–0
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is FC Cincinnati win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors FC Cincinnati

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 44% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 2.00 vs 0.90

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual New England Revolution win · AI FC Cincinnati win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

FC Cincinnati
—
Last 5
L W L D
8 GF · 9 GA
Recent fixtures
  • New England Revolution 2-3 L
  • Atlanta United FC 1-3 W
  • CF Montreal 3-1 L
  • Houston Dynamo 2-2 D
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

New England Revolution
—
Last 5
W L L W
5 GF · 9 GA
Recent fixtures
  • FC Cincinnati 2-3 W
  • Seattle Sounders 0-3 L
  • Real Salt Lake 3-0 L
  • Chicago Fire 1-2 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

FCC 0 · D 0 · NEW 1

FCC VS NEW
2-3
AWAY WIN
Oct 14, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 100% of models side with FC Cincinnati, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

FC Cincinnati
~100%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
New England Revolution
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.90 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.2 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When FC Cincinnati is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.90 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: FC Cincinnati win. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.