ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66% ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 49% KON 1-2 GAL · 54% LEH 0-2 PAR · 64% NIC 1-2 REN · 50% BOD 1-2 VIK · 46% LYN 1-1 RAN · 41% ALS 1-2 AL- · 56% SVE 1-2 FSV · 46% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 62% VIL 2-1 ESP · 56% SHE 2-1 WRE · 48% LIL 2-1 LEN · 50% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66%
UEFA Europa League · League Stage - 4 Nov 5, 2026 · 17:45 · UTC Selhurst Park, London Not Started

Crystal Palace
vs
1899 Hoffenheim.

Quick answer

Who will win Crystal Palace vs 1899 Hoffenheim?

9 of 10 AI models pick Crystal Palace to win (90%). The mean predicted score is 2–1 at 53% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Crystal Palace form 1899 Hoffenheim form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Crystal Palace (9 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 53% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

UEFA Europa League table Where Crystal Palace and 1899 Hoffenheim stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Crystal Palace win 90%

9 / 10 models

Draw 10%

1 / 10 models

1899 Hoffenheim win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Crystal Palace win
2–1
54%
Palace have scored in all three Europa League matches and bring home advantage, while Hoffenheim have lost two of three and failed to score once. Both defenses look vulnerable, favoring a narrow 2-1 home win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Crystal Palace win
2–1
52%
Palace scoring well at home (8 goals, clean sheet record) while Hoffenheim struggle with 2 losses in 3; both teams concede, favoring a narrow home win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Crystal Palace win
2–1
52%
Crystal Palace have shown reliable scoring form at Selhurst Park in Europe. Hoffenheim pose a threat through Kramarić, but their defensive record away tips this narrowly to Palace.
04
Grok 4.6
Crystal Palace win
2–1
50%
Palace have scored in every EL game (8 in 3) at Selhurst; Hoffenheim are 1-0-2 and leakier away. Home edge, open but not a blowout.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Crystal Palace win
2–1
48%
Palace have scored 8 in 3 UEL games and play at Selhurst Park, while Hoffenheim have lost 2 of 3 and conceded 5. Palace's stronger attack edges a close contest.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Crystal Palace win
2–1
52%
Palace score freely at home (8 goals in 3 UEL games, never blanked) while Hoffenheim's away form is poor (2 losses in 3). Expect goals both ways given Palace's leaky defence.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Draw
1–1
58%
Both teams balanced in form and goals; Palace’s home edge offset by Hoffenheim’s late scoring threat.
08
Kimi K3
Crystal Palace win
2–1
52%
Palace's 8 goals in 3 Europa League games and Selhurst Park edge outweigh Hoffenheim's two losses, though Kramaric's creativity keeps the visitors dangerous.
09
GLM 5.3
Crystal Palace win
2–1
55%
Palace have scored in every UEL game (8 in 3) with Selhurst Park advantage; Hoffenheim's leaky defence (5 conceded in 3) suggests goals both ways but home edge.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Crystal Palace win
2–1
52%
Palace unbeaten in two of three UEL games with 8 goals, Pino scoring; Hoffenheim lost two of three and failed to score once. Selhurst Park edge gives a narrow home win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

9 of 10 models settled on 2–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 2–1
    9 models
  • 1–1
    1 model
Team news

Predicted lineups: Crystal Palace vs 1899 Hoffenheim

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1 · XI v Fulham, 28 Oct
P. Sage
9 E. Nketiah
9 Nketiah
24 D. Osorio
24 Osorio
29 E. Guessand
29 Guessand
8 J. Lerma
8 Lerma
28 C. Doucouré
28 Doucouré
19 W. Hughes
19 Hughes
30 Óscar Mingueza
30 Mingueza
21 H. Ahanor
21 Ahanor
33 B. Chilwell
33 Chilwell
26 C. Richards
26 Richards
1 D. Henderson
1 Henderson

1899 Hoffenheim

4-2-3-1 · XI v Holstein Kiel, 28 Oct
C. Ilzer
19 T. Lemperle
19 Lemperle
22 A. Prass
22 Prass
10 A. Hložek
10 Hložek
27 A. Kramarić
27 Kramarić
18 W. Burger
18 Burger
7 L. Avdullahu
7 Avdullahu
13 Bernardo
13 Bernardo
28 K. Machida
28 Machida
2 R. Hranáč
2 Hranáč
15 V. Gendrey
15 Gendrey
37 L. Philipp
37 Philipp

Season data

UEFA Europa League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1
W-D-L
1-1-1
Goals
8-5
Clean sheets
1
Failed to score
0
Best win run
1
Penalties
1/1
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

1899 Hoffenheim

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
1-0-2
Goals
5-5
Clean sheets
1
Failed to score
1
Best win run
0
Penalties
0/0
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Crystal Palace

  • Yeremy Pino 3 G · 0 A · 3 apps
  • A. Wharton 0 G · 2 A · 3 apps

Key players · 1899 Hoffenheim

  • A. Kramarić 1 G · 2 A · 3 apps

Top scorers · UEFA Europa League

  1. 1 L. Diony Omonia Nicosia 4
  2. 2 A. Cissè AC Milan 3
  3. 3 Yeremy Pino Crystal Palace 3
  4. 4 Sergio Gómez Real Sociedad 3
  5. 5 K. Zachariassen Ferencvarosi TC 3
Venue Selhurst Park, London
New at Crystal Palace B. Chilwell (Strasbourg), D. Osorio (FC Midtjylland), Q. Timber (Marseille)
New at 1899 Hoffenheim A. Daghim (Red Bull Salzburg), Nathan De Cat (Anderlecht), A. Skender (Omonia Nicosia)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Crystal Palace

90% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 53% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.90 vs 1.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Match stats forecast

Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.

No AI
Metric Crystal Palace 1899 Hoffenheim Expected total Lean
Corners 4.8 5.5 10.3 Under 10.5 55% Ask AI
Yellow cards 1.7 2.3 4.0 Under 4.5 62% Ask AI
Shots 12.9 14.1 27.0 Under 27.5 55% Ask AI
Shots on target 4.0 4.7 8.7 Over 8.5 50% Ask AI

Sample: 10 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Crystal Palace
#15 · 3 PTS · GD +3
Last 5
W L D L L
5 GF · 12 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Fulham 0-1 W
  • Newcastle 0-2 L
  • Beşiktaş 2-2 D
  • Brighton 5-0 L
  • Lyon 3-2 L
Team news
J. Mateta — Hamstring Injury C. Riad — Knee Injury I. Sarr — Injury E. Nketiah — Injury C. Doucoure — Off the roster Z. Gozo — Off the roster E. Guessand — Off the roster D. Henderson — Foot Injury J. Lerma — Off the roster A. Disasi — Red Card B. Chilwell — Injury T. Tomiyasu — Calf Injury
1899 Hoffenheim
#30 · 0 PTS · GD -3
Last 5
D W W W L
11 GF · 5 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Holstein Kiel 1-1 D
  • Bayer Leverkusen 3-0 W
  • Lyon 3-0 W
  • Borussia Mönchengladbach 1-2 W
  • Beşiktaş 2-3 L
Team news
F. Asllani — Injury T. Lemperle — Red Card A. Prass — Muscle Injury L. Engelns — Off the roster A. Hajdari — Foot Injury P. Wimmer — Thigh Injury Bernardo — Achilles Tendon Injury N. De Cat — Knee Injury B. Conte — Injury V. Gendrey — Ankle Injury

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 90% of models side with Crystal Palace, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 10% — tight UEFA Europa League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Crystal Palace
~90%
implied lean
Draw
~10%
implied lean
1899 Hoffenheim
~0%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.90 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.2 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Crystal Palace is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.90 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Crystal Palace win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Crystal Palace vs 1899 Hoffenheim in UEFA Europa League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Crystal Palace win, with vote shares roughly 90% / 10% / 0% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Crystal Palace vs 1899 Hoffenheim, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.