Colorado Rapids
vs
Chicago Fire.
Quick answer
Who will win Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire?
8 of 10 AI models pick Chicago Fire to win (80%). The mean predicted score is 1–2 at 49% average confidence (medium).
Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.
Head-to-head history → Colorado Rapids form Chicago Fire form
10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Chicago Fire (8 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 49% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.
Who do you think will win?
Vote before kick-off and compare with AI
Where the panel lands.
Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.
0 / 10 models
2 / 10 models
8 / 10 models
10 picks. Receipts attached.
Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.
How often each scoreline showed up.
7 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.
-
1–2
7 models
-
1–1
2 models
-
2–3
1 model
Bookmakers vs the AI panel
Bet365 · 2.25 / 3.80 / 2.90Grey: bookmaker prices as probabilities, margin removed. Lime: share of the 11 AI models picking each result.
Predicted lineups: Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire
Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.
Colorado Rapids
2 of this XI are ruled out of this match or no longer at the club.
Chicago Fire
G. Berhalter
Trends and hit rates
How often each market landed in Colorado Rapids's and Chicago Fire's last 10 matches, from our results archive.
| Market |
Colorado Rapids (at home)
W
D
D
D
L
W
|
Chicago Fire (away)
W
L
W
L
|
|---|---|---|
| Won |
33%
All games 22% (2/9)
|
–
All games 44% (4/9)
|
| Drew |
50%
All games 56% (5/9)
|
–
All games 11% (1/9)
|
| Over 1.5 goals |
67%
All games 67% (6/9)
|
–
All games 78% (7/9)
|
| Over 2.5 goals |
50%
All games 56% (5/9)
|
–
All games 78% (7/9)
|
| Over 3.5 goals |
33%
All games 44% (4/9)
|
–
All games 44% (4/9)
|
| Both teams scored |
50%
All games 56% (5/9)
|
–
All games 67% (6/9)
|
| Scored |
83%
All games 78% (7/9)
|
–
All games 78% (7/9)
|
| Clean sheet |
33%
All games 33% (3/9)
|
–
All games 11% (1/9)
|
| Over 9.5 corners |
–
All games 57% (4/7)
|
–
All games 43% (3/7)
|
| Over 3.5 yellow cards |
–
All games 43% (3/7)
|
–
All games 43% (3/7)
|
Bars run newest to oldest. Corners and cards count matches with full statistics only.
Season data
Major League Soccer numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.
Colorado Rapids
4-2-3-1- W-D-L
- 12-7-13
- Goals
- 44-43
- Clean sheets
- 11
- Failed to score
- 8
- Best win run
- 3
- Penalties
- 3/4
Chicago Fire
4-4-2- W-D-L
- 15-7-10
- Goals
- 57-48
- Clean sheets
- 7
- Failed to score
- 3
- Best win run
- 3
- Penalties
- 4/8
Key players · Colorado Rapids
-
P. Aaronson
7 G · 8 A · 31 apps
Key players · Chicago Fire
-
P. Zinckernagel
7 G · 8 A · 30 apps
Top scorers · Major League Soccer
- 1 L. Messi Inter Miami 25
- 2 P. Musa FC Dallas 22
- 3 M. Iloski Philadelphia Union 19
- 4 D. Bouanga Los Angeles FC 18
- 5 S. Surridge Nashville SC 18
What’s moving the panel.
80% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.
Mean 49% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.
Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.
Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.
Ask the Council about this match
Pro10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.
Match stats forecast
Corners, cards and shots from each side's last 10 matches at this venue, blended with the league average. Pure statistics, not an AI vote.
| Metric | Colorado Rapids | Chicago Fire | Expected total | Lean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 5.3 | 5.3 | 10.6 | Under 10.5 51% | Ask AI |
| Yellow cards | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | Under 3.5 53% | Ask AI |
| Shots | 14.7 | 13.7 | 28.5 | Under 28.5 51% | Ask AI |
| Shots on target | 6.0 | 4.5 | 10.5 | Under 10.5 53% | Ask AI |
Sample: 3 matches per side. Over the last 90 days the corners lean hit 55% of 249 graded matches, cards 58% of 250. Probabilities are Poisson estimates for information only.
Form, history, team news.
- San Jose Earthquakes 2-2 D
- Vancouver Whitecaps 1-0 W
- Portland Timbers 0-0 D
- Minnesota United FC 2-2 D
- San Jose Earthquakes 1-1 D
J. Atencio — Yellow Cards
Z. Steffen — Shoulder Injury
K. Thompson — Red Card
R. Cannon — Leg Injury
A. Fadal — Injury
Y. Maziz — Leg Injury
I. Sadiq — Leg Injury
- Orlando City SC 2-2 D
- Atlanta United FC 2-3 W
- New England Revolution 1-0 L
- Philadelphia Union 1-3 L
- New York City FC 2-1 W
R. Lod — Lower-Body Injury
S. Rogers — Lower-Body Injury
Last five meetings.
COL 2 · D 1 · CHI 2
Confidence trend
Cumulative average confidence in table order.
Betting tips (AI-signal view)
Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.
- Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with Colorado Rapids, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
- Watch the draw lane at 20% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
- If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.
Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)
Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.
Over / under prediction (totals)
Model-derived xG sums to 3.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.
Handicap prediction (spread-style read)
When Colorado Rapids is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.
BTTS prediction (both teams to score)
With combined offensive weight near 3.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.
Best bet framing (consensus-led)
Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Chicago Fire win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.
Match overview
Looking for a today prediction on Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.
This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chicago Fire win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 20% / 80% home, draw, and away (rounded).
If you are asking who will win Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.
Explore more
Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.
Related matches
- Nashville SC vs New York Red Bulls Major League Soccer
- Vancouver Whitecaps vs Seattle Sounders Major League Soccer
- Atlanta United FC vs Toronto FC Major League Soccer
- Charlotte vs Orlando City SC Major League Soccer
- FC Cincinnati vs Philadelphia Union Major League Soccer
- Columbus Crew vs DC United Major League Soccer
- New York City FC vs CF Montreal Major League Soccer
- Sporting Kansas City vs FC Dallas Major League Soccer
From the blog
Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.
Le Havre vs Paris Saint Germain prediction: AI panel unanimously backs PSG in Ligue 1. See consensus, score picks and confidence for Friday's clash.
Manchester City vs Brighton prediction for their Premier League clash. The AI panel unanimously backs a narrow City win with both teams scoring.
Vegas Golden Knights vs New Jersey Devils prediction: the AI panel unanimously backs Vegas in this NHL clash, with a 3-2 scoreline and 58% confidence.
Levante vs Atletico Madrid prediction for their La Liga clash. The AI panel unanimously backs an Atletico win, with a clean sheet the most likely outcome.
Read our Chelsea vs Manchester United prediction for the Premier League clash at Stamford Bridge. The AI panel unanimously backs a narrow home win.
Gremio vs Atletico Paranaense prediction for the Serie A clash, with the AI panel's consensus, most common score and a clear winner at Arena do Grêmio.
Ask multiple AIs about this match.
10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.
You've used today's 3 free matches
Get the free app to see the AI picks for every match, follow your teams and get the picks before kickoff.
Get the free app Back to today's matches