MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62% MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62%
Pro League · Regular Season - 12 Al-Hazem Club Stadium, Ar Rass Not Started

Al-Hazm
vs
Al-Nassr.

Quick answer

Who will win Al-Hazm vs Al-Nassr?

10 of 10 AI models pick Al-Nassr to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 0–2 at 62% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Al-Hazm form Al-Nassr form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (806 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Al-Nassr (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 0–2 at 62% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Pro League table Where Al-Hazm and Al-Nassr stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Al-Hazm win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Al-Nassr win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Al-Nassr win
0–2
76%
Al-Nassr’s 8-1-1 record, 23-8 goal difference and unbroken scoring strongly outweigh Al-Hazm’s 2-4-5 start. Recent head-to-heads also consistently favor Al-Nassr, while Al-Hazm have failed to score three times.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Al-Nassr win
1–3
62%
Al-Nassr's dominant form (8W1D1L, 23 scored, never blanked) and consistent H2H wins over Al-Hazm outweigh home advantage for a struggling mid-table Al-Hazm side.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Al-Nassr win
0–2
72%
Al-Nassr are in dominant form with 8 wins and 23 goals scored, while Al-Hazm are winless in five and struggle to create against elite defenses.
04
Grok 4.7
Al-Nassr win
0–2
58%
Nassr's 8-1-1 form, attack that always scores, and recent 0-2/4-0 H2H beat Hazm's leaky LDLLD side; 0-2 fits their control better than a 1-2.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Al-Nassr win
0–2
68%
Al-Nassr lead the league with 8W1D1L and 23-8 goals while Al-Hazm sit near the bottom with LDLLD form. H2H shows Al-Nassr winning 4-0 and 2-0 in recent meetings; Al-Hazm have failed to score in 3 games.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Al-Nassr win
0–2
22%
Al-Nassr dominant (8W 1D 1L, 23 scored, 8 conceded); Al-Hazm in poor form (LDLLD). H2H at this venue shows 0-2 and 1-2; Al-Nassr's defense and Al-Hazm's scoring struggles support a clean sheet.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
Al-Nassr win
0–2
66%
Al-Nassr DWWWW with 28-11 and never blanking faces struggling DLLDL Hazm; recent H2H 4-0 and 0-2 shows mismatch persists.
08
Kimi K3
Al-Nassr win
0–2
68%
Al-Nassr's dominant form (8W 1D 1L, 23-8 goals) and perfect scoring record contrast with Al-Hazm's struggles (2W 4D 5L, failed to score 3 times). Recent H2H includes a 0-2 Al-Nassr win at this venue, supporting an away clean sheet.
09
GLM 5.3
Al-Nassr win
0–2
62%
Al-Nassr are in dominant form (8W-1D-1L, 23 goals) and beat Al-Hazm comfortably in all recent H2H meetings; Al-Hazm's weak attack (3 blanks) supports a 0-2 line.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Al-Nassr win
0–2
68%
Al-Nassr lead the table with 23 goals in 10 and beat Al-Hazm 4-0 and 2-0 recently; Al-Hazm's winless run and 12 goals scored point to a controlled away win at Ar Rass.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

9 of 10 models settled on 0–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 0–2
    9 models
  • 1–3
    1 model
Team news

Predicted lineups: Al-Hazm vs Al-Nassr

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

Al-Hazm

4-3-3 · XI v Al Khaleej Saihat, 29 Oct
J. Kadri
70 Ahmed Al Shamrani
70 Shamrani
9 Afimico Pululu
9 Pululu
77 M. Al Hamdani
77 Hamdani
28 S. Bendebka
28 Bendebka
17 Bonheur Mugisha
17 Mugisha
24 A. Bah
24 Bah
27 Ahmed Al Nakhli
27 Nakhli
3 A. Ben Hmida
3 Hmida
4 Sultan Tanker
4 Tanker
Left
5 Mohammed Issa
5 Issa
36 J. Staněk
36 Staněk

1 of this XI is ruled out of this match or no longer at the club.

Al-Nassr

4-4-2 · XI v Al Kholood, 29 Oct
A. Postecoglou
7 Cristiano Ronaldo
7 Ronaldo
79 João Félix
79 Félix
10 S. Mané
10 Mané
20 Ângelo
20 Ângelo
17 Abdullah Al Khaibari
17 Khaibari
9 Abdullah Al Hamdan
9 Hamdan
23 Ayman Yahya
23 Yahya
26 Íñigo Martínez
26 Martínez
3 M. Simakan
3 Simakan
12 Nawaf Boushal
12 Boushal
24 Bento
24 Bento

Season data

Pro League numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

Al-Hazm

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
2-4-6
Goals
14-20
Clean sheets
2
Failed to score
3
Best win run
1
Penalties
3/3
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Al-Nassr

4-4-2
W-D-L
9-1-1
Goals
28-11
Clean sheets
4
Failed to score
0
Best win run
4
Penalties
0/1
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · Al-Hazm

  • No player in the competition's top scorers or assisters.

Key players · Al-Nassr

  • João Félix 3 G · 8 A · 10 apps
  • Cristiano Ronaldo 8 G · 0 A · 10 apps
  • Ângelo 5 G · 3 A · 10 apps

Top scorers · Pro League

  1. 1 I. Toney Al-Ahli Jeddah 13
  2. 2 T. Reijnders Al-Qadisiyah FC 8
  3. 3 Cristiano Ronaldo Al-Nassr 8
  4. 4 Y. En-Nesyri Al-Ittihad FC 7
  5. 5 M. Retegui Al-Qadisiyah FC 7
Venue Al-Hazem Club Stadium, Ar Rass
New at Al-Hazm J. Staněk (Slavia Praha), E. Acolatse (Ferencvarosi TC), Aboubacar Diakite (ES Tunis)
New at Al-Nassr Abdulhadi Al-Alwan (Al-Fateh), Samú Costa (Mallorca), Wesley Gassova (Real Sociedad)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Al-Nassr

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 62% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 0.10 vs 2.10

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Al-Hazm
#13 · 10 PTS · GD -4
Last 5
L D L L D
7 GF · 11 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Al Khaleej Saihat 4-2 L
  • Al-Fayha 2-2 D
  • Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1-0 L
  • Al-Fateh 2-3 L
  • NEOM 1-1 D
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Al-Nassr
#2 · 25 PTS · GD +15
Last 5
W W W W W
15 GF · 5 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Al Kholood 5-3 W
  • Al-Faisaly FC 1-3 W
  • NEOM 1-0 W
  • Neftchi 3-1 W
  • Al Diriyah 3-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

ALH 0 · D 1 · ALN 4

ALN VS ALH
4-0
HOME WIN
Feb 21, 2026
ALH VS ALN
0-2
AWAY WIN
Oct 25, 2025
ALH VS ALN
1-2
AWAY WIN
Sep 23, 2024
ALN VS ALH
4-4
DRAW
Feb 29, 2024
ALH VS ALN
1-5
AWAY WIN
Sep 2, 2023

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with Al-Hazm, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Pro League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Al-Hazm
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Al-Nassr
~100%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.20 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.5 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Al-Hazm is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.20 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Al-Nassr win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Al-Hazm vs Al-Nassr in Pro League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (0 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Al-Nassr win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 0% / 100% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Al-Hazm vs Al-Nassr, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.