ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 48% KON 1-2 GAL · 53% LEH 0-2 PAR · 63% NIC 1-2 REN · 48% BOD 1-2 VIK · 44% LYN 1-1 RAN · 40% ALS 1-2 AL- · 55% SVE 1-2 FSV · 45% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 61% VIL 2-1 ESP · 55% SHE 2-1 WRE · 47% LIL 2-1 LEN · 49% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66% ABH 0-2 AL- · 64% ALD 0-1 NEO · 48% KON 1-2 GAL · 53% LEH 0-2 PAR · 63% NIC 1-2 REN · 48% BOD 1-2 VIK · 44% LYN 1-1 RAN · 40% ALS 1-2 AL- · 55% SVE 1-2 FSV · 45% ZUL 0-2 CLU · 61% VIL 2-1 ESP · 55% SHE 2-1 WRE · 47% LIL 2-1 LEN · 49% CAS 0-2 SPO · 66%
Allsvenskan · Regular Season - 26 Nov 8, 2026 · 15:30 · UTC Strawberry Arena, Solna Not Started

AIK Stockholm
vs
BK Hacken.

Quick answer

Who will win AIK Stockholm vs BK Hacken?

10 of 10 AI models pick BK Hacken to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 1–2 at 51% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → AIK Stockholm form BK Hacken form

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 62% of the time (751 matches).

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward BK Hacken (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 51% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

Allsvenskan table Where AIK Stockholm and BK Hacken stand right now
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

AIK Stockholm win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

BK Hacken win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
BK Hacken win
1–2
58%
Hacken’s stronger season record, four-match winning run, superior goal difference and 11 clean sheets outweigh AIK’s home advantage. Recent head-to-heads have been competitive, so a narrow away win is more likely than a comfortable result.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
BK Hacken win
1–2
53%
Hacken's superior form (DWWWW, 11 clean sheets) and stronger attack contrast with AIK's shaky DLLDW run; AIK can still score at home.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
BK Hacken win
1–2
48%
Hacken enter in strong form with four wins in five, powered by Lindgren and Lindberg. AIK have struggled defensively all season, making an away edge likely.
04
Grok 4.7
BK Hacken win
1–2
52%
Hacken’s DWWWW form, 11 clean sheets and 47-30 attack beat AIK’s mixed DLLDW and leaky 40-43. Home can nick one; Hacken still edges it.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
BK Hacken win
1–2
51%
Hacken are unbeaten in five with four wins and stronger season form, while AIK have lost three of five. AIK's home edge keeps it close, but Hacken's attack and momentum edge the result.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
BK Hacken win
0–1
40%
Hacken's superior form (DWWWW), 11 clean sheets, and AIK's poor run (DLLDW) favour a narrow away win; recent 0-0 H2H supports low scoring.
07
Meta Muse Spark 1.3
BK Hacken win
1–2
52%
Hacken WWWWD with 12 clean sheets vs AIK LLDWD leaking 45 goals. AIK scores at home but Hacken attack with Lindberg and Lindgren should edge it.
08
Kimi K3
BK Hacken win
1–2
48%
Hacken in stronger form (DWWWW vs DLLDW), better attack (47 vs 40 goals) and defense (11 clean sheets vs 4); AIK's home edge and H2H history temper confidence.
09
GLM 5.3
BK Hacken win
2–3
52%
Hacken's superior season (47-30, 11 clean sheets) and DWWWW form outweigh AIK's home venue; recent H2H is mixed (0-0, 4-0 AIK), so only modest away-edge confidence.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
BK Hacken win
1–2
52%
Hacken's DWWWW form and 47-30 goals with 11 clean sheets outclass AIK's DLLDW and 40-43 record; AIK's home edge is offset by Hacken's superior attack and defensive stability.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–2
    8 models
  • 0–1
    1 model
  • 2–3
    1 model
Team news

Predicted lineups: AIK Stockholm vs BK Hacken

Each side's last starting XI, with players ruled out of this match marked. The confirmed lineups replace this about an hour before kickoff.

AIK Stockholm

4-3-3 · XI v IF Elfsborg, 27 Oct
Jose Riveiro
8 J. Hove
8 Hove
9 L. Carlstrand
9 Carlstrand
48 A. Kouame
48 Kouame
46 Yannick Geiger
46 Geiger
18 A. Ali
18 Ali
10 L. Assadi
10 Assadi
5 L. Bergquist
5 Bergquist
34 W. Olofsson
34 Olofsson
33 D. Tomas
33 Tomas
2 E. Edh
2 Edh
15 K. Nordfeldt
15 Nordfeldt

BK Hacken

4-2-3-1 · XI v IF Brommapojkarna, 28 Oct
J. Gustafsson
9 G. Lindgren
9 Lindgren
11 Julius Lindberg
11 Lindberg
10 M. Rygaard
10 Rygaard
20 A. Svanbäck
20 Svanbäck
19 D. Seger
19 Seger
6 A. Doumbia
6 Doumbia
21 A. Lundkvist
21 Lundkvist
22 F. Helander
22 Helander
13 H. Hilvenius
13 Hilvenius
5 B. Wembangomo
5 Wembangomo
99 E. Berisha
99 Berisha

Season data

Allsvenskan numbers for both sides, when they score and the players who carry them.

AIK Stockholm

4-3-3
W-D-L
10-8-8
Goals
42-45
Clean sheets
4
Failed to score
5
Best win run
3
Penalties
3/3
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

BK Hacken

4-2-3-1
W-D-L
12-10-4
Goals
47-30
Clean sheets
12
Failed to score
4
Best win run
4
Penalties
2/2
When they score
15'30'45'60'75'90'
When they concede
15'30'45'60'75'90'

Key players · AIK Stockholm

  • J. Hove 10 G · 3 A · 24 apps
  • K. Filling 2 G · 5 A · 17 apps

Key players · BK Hacken

  • Julius Lindberg 9 G · 8 A · 24 apps
  • A. Svanbäck 7 G · 8 A · 26 apps
  • G. Lindgren 13 G · 1 A · 26 apps

Top scorers · Allsvenskan

  1. 1 K. Lien Djurgardens IF 16
  2. 2 R. Ure Sirius 15
  3. 3 P. Abraham Hammarby FF 14
  4. 4 I. Bjerkebo Sirius 14
  5. 5 G. Lindgren BK Hacken 13
Venue Strawberry Arena, Solna
New at AIK Stockholm R. Krugel (Sirius), S. Hausner (AC Horsens), L. Assadi (Universidad de Chile)
New at BK Hacken M. Agger (Pogon Szczecin), E. Mahari (Reims II), M. Haaland (Brann)
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors BK Hacken

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 51% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.00 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

— Match context

Form, history, team news.

AIK Stockholm
#8 · 38 PTS · GD -3
Last 5
D W D L L
12 GF · 13 GA
Recent fixtures
  • IF Elfsborg 2-2 D
  • Sirius 1-2 W
  • IFK Goteborg 2-2 D
  • IF Brommapojkarna 5-6 L
  • Halmstad 2-1 L
Team news
E. Edh — Injury M. Ellingsen — Leg Injury F. Nissen — Inactive A. Redkin — Knee Injury M. Thychosen — Inactive A. Helm — Inactive D. Besirovic — Injury L. Bergquist — Inactive J. Hove — Inactive S. Papagiannopoulos — Inactive C. Pavey — Inactive Z. Yohanna — Muscle Injury
BK Hacken
#4 · 46 PTS · GD +17
Last 5
D W W W W
9 GF · 0 GA
Recent fixtures
  • IF Brommapojkarna 0-0 D
  • Degerfors IF 4-0 W
  • Malmo FF 0-1 W
  • Orgryte IS 3-0 W
  • IF Elfsborg 0-1 W
Team news
E. Berisha — Inactive S. Kondo — Inactive J. Laursen — Knee Injury L. Vaisanen — Knee Injury D. Seger — Inactive A. Linde — Injury S. Andersen — Yellow Cards M. Rygaard — Yellow Cards A. Doumbia — Yellow Cards A. Lundkvist — Inactive D. Al Saed — Inactive F. Helander — Yellow Cards

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with AIK Stockholm, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Allsvenskan games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

AIK Stockholm
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
BK Hacken
~100%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 3.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When AIK Stockholm is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 3.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: BK Hacken win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on AIK Stockholm vs BK Hacken in Allsvenskan? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is BK Hacken win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 0% / 100% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win AIK Stockholm vs BK Hacken, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.