MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62% MON 1-1 CLU · 43% GUA 2-0 ATL · 58% COL 1-2 CHI · 49% CLU 2-1 TOL · 54% YOK 1-2 KAW · 47% JEF 1-1 AVI · 42% V-V 1-0 TOK · 44% MAC 2-0 GAM · 62% AME 3-0 EYü · 71% PEC 1-1 ADO · 40% COM 2-0 VEN · 63% CER 1-2 ANT · 50% GET 0-1 SEV · 50% FAL 0-2 CEL · 62%
NPB Finished

Yakult Swallows
vs
Hiroshima Carp.

Quick answer

Who will win Yakult Swallows vs Hiroshima Carp?

Final score: Yakult Swallows 0–3 Hiroshima Carp. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Yakult Swallows to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 5–3.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before first pitch. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 59% of the time (239 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Yakult Swallows (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 5–3 at 53% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Yakult Swallows win 100%

10 / 10 models

Hiroshima Carp win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-6 Luna
Yakult Swallows win
4–3
55%
Yakult won three of the last five meetings, including two sizable victories, while Hiroshima took the latest game. At Yakult’s venue, expect a competitive, moderately scoring contest with a narrow home edge.
02
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Yakult Swallows win
6–4
60%
Yakult won 3 of last 5 meetings including two lopsided wins at home; recent momentum and venue favor Swallows in a moderately high-scoring game.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Yakult Swallows win
4–2
58%
Yakult holds the recent head-to-head advantage and benefits from home-field conditions at Meiji Jingu Stadium to secure a steady victory.
04
Grok 4.7
Yakult Swallows win
5–3
56%
Recent H2H favors Yakult 3-2, with a 12-0 home blowout in August. Limited other 2026 context; home park and slight form edge point to a moderate Swallows win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Yakult Swallows win
4–2
58%
Yakult took two of the last three meetings and have home advantage; Hiroshima's latest 5-1 win looks less representative, so a controlled home win fits.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Yakult Swallows win
4–2
58%
Yakult won 3 of last 5 H2H including a 12-0 home blowout; home advantage and recent head-to-head edge support a moderate Swallows victory.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Yakult Swallows win
5–3
60%
Home edge and strong recent home form vs Carp outweigh Hiroshima's last win.
08
Kimi K3
Yakult Swallows win
5–3
58%
Yakult took three of the last five meetings, including a 12-0 home rout, and plays at home here; Hiroshima's latest win keeps this competitive, so a moderate two-run home edge.
09
GLM 5.3
Yakult Swallows win
5–3
56%
Yakult won three of the last five H2H meetings, including a 12-0 and 9-1 blowout at home; their offense has outscored Hiroshima 28-11 across those games, so a moderate home win fits.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Yakult Swallows win
5–3
55%
Yakult's home edge includes a recent 12-0 win, while Hiroshima away has low-scoring trends in H2H, favoring a moderate home victory.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 5–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 5–3
    5 models
  • 4–2
    3 models
  • 4–3
    1 model
  • 6–4
    1 model
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Yakult Swallows

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before first pitch.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 53% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 4.70 vs 2.80

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Yakult Swallows vs Hiroshima Carp in NPB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (5 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before first pitch.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Yakult Swallows win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Yakult Swallows vs Hiroshima Carp, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.