JUV 2-0 REN · 59% ARA 1-2 AZA · 54% DIN 1-0 NEC · 55% FER 2-0 TOR · 64% LEC 1-1 SUN · 48% OFI 0-2 BAY · 62% UNI 2-0 HAP · 56% STU 0-1 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53% INT 0-1 UNI · 52% FKJ 0-2 BRI · 59% KAU 0-2 BRA · 62% JUV 2-0 REN · 59% ARA 1-2 AZA · 54% DIN 1-0 NEC · 55% FER 2-0 TOR · 64% LEC 1-1 SUN · 48% OFI 0-2 BAY · 62% UNI 2-0 HAP · 56% STU 0-1 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53% INT 0-1 UNI · 52% FKJ 0-2 BRI · 59% KAU 0-2 BRA · 62%
MLB · Semi-finals Oct 13, 2026 · 00:00 Finished

Tampa Bay Rays
vs
Cleveland Guardians.

Quick answer

Who will win Tampa Bay Rays vs Cleveland Guardians?

Final score: Tampa Bay Rays 3–7 Cleveland Guardians. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick Tampa Bay Rays to win (100%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 4–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before first pitch. Not betting advice.

All 10 AIs agree. When the whole council agrees, it has been right 58% of the time (237 games).

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Tampa Bay Rays (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 53% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Tampa Bay Rays win 100%

10 / 10 models

Cleveland Guardians win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Tampa Bay Rays win
3–2
61%
Tampa Bay won four of the last five meetings, including a three-game sweep, and returns to its home venue. The repeated low-scoring results support a tight game rather than a large margin.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
58%
Rays won 4 of last 5 head-to-head meetings including a dominant 11-3 blowout, suggesting a current matchup edge plus home-field advantage in a semifinal.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
55%
Tampa Bay has historically controlled low-scoring pitching duels against Cleveland, and home advantage tips a tight postseason contest in their favor.
04
Grok 4.6
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
58%
Rays took three recent home games vs Cleveland, two by shutout. Playoff semi at Tampa favors their pitching, but Guardians should keep the margin modest.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
58%
Rays swept the last three meetings and held Cleveland scoreless twice; home venue and recent dominance support a narrow Tampa Bay win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Tampa Bay Rays win
3–2
60%
Rays swept Cleveland at home in July with dominant pitching; semi-final context suggests a tight, low-scoring affair but home H2H edge favors Tampa Bay.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
62%
Rays dominated recent H2H (3-1 in last 5) and home advantage; Guardians' lone win was close.
08
Kimi K3
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
62%
Rays dominated July H2H with three straight wins including two shutouts, showing their pitching matches up well against Cleveland's lineup; home field in semi-final adds edge.
09
GLM 5.3
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
58%
Rays won four of five recent meetings, including three straight at home in July, with pitching dominating both sides; expect another low-scoring game with Tampa Bay's home edge decisive.
10
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Tampa Bay Rays win
4–2
62%
Rays have dominated recent H2H at home, winning 3 of last 4, including a 3-0 and 11-3. Their strong pitching and home field edge in a semi-final supports a low-scoring win.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

8 of 10 models settled on 4–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 4–2
    8 models
  • 3–2
    2 models
— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Tampa Bay Rays

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before first pitch.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 53% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.80 vs 2.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Rest, recent form and home advantage usually decide whether the favourite wins comfortably or the game stays close; check both teams below.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Tampa Bay Rays vs Cleveland Guardians in MLB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before first pitch.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Tampa Bay Rays win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Tampa Bay Rays vs Cleveland Guardians, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.