EIN 2-1 1.F · 49% LEM 1-2 TOU · 44% FRO 1-1 SAS · 42% DEP 1-1 LEV · 44% EVE 1-2 CHE · 46% ESP 1-2 ATL · 48% VEN 0-2 NAP · 54% BAY 2-1 SCF · 49% UNI 0-2 BOR · 51% BOR 2-1 189 · 45% HAM 1-2 VFB · 47% WER 2-1 SCP · 49% FCS 1-0 FSV · 44% SVE 1-2 FCA · 47% EIN 2-1 1.F · 49% LEM 1-2 TOU · 44% FRO 1-1 SAS · 42% DEP 1-1 LEV · 44% EVE 1-2 CHE · 46% ESP 1-2 ATL · 48% VEN 0-2 NAP · 54% BAY 2-1 SCF · 49% UNI 0-2 BOR · 51% BOR 2-1 189 · 45% HAM 1-2 VFB · 47% WER 2-1 SCP · 49% FCS 1-0 FSV · 44% SVE 1-2 FCA · 47%
CPBL Oct 6, 2026 · 10:35 Finished

Rakuten Monkeys
vs
Fubon Guardians.

Quick answer

Who will win Rakuten Monkeys vs Fubon Guardians?

Final score: Rakuten Monkeys 1–6 Fubon Guardians. Before kickoff, 5 of 10 AI models pick Rakuten Monkeys to win (50%); the consensus was wrong. The AI predicted score was 4–2.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward Rakuten Monkeys (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 4–2 at 51% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Rakuten Monkeys beat Fubon Guardians in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Rakuten Monkeys win 50%

5 / 10 models

Fubon Guardians win 50%

5 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Rakuten Monkeys win
4–3
53%
Rakuten split the recent five-game series with Fubon but won two of the three latest meetings, including a 3-2 result. Home advantage supports a narrow, moderate-scoring Monkeys victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Fubon Guardians win
4–5
58%
Fubon won 3 of last 5 h2h meetings including two tight recent games, showing current edge over Rakuten despite one lopsided Monkeys win.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Rakuten Monkeys win
4–2
58%
Recent head-to-head meetings have been predominantly low-scoring pitching duels; Rakuten's home field advantage gives them a slight edge in a tightly contested CPBL matchup.
04
Grok 4.6
Rakuten Monkeys win
4–2
55%
Mixed H2H with two recent low-scoring Fubon wins, but Rakuten at home after beating Fubon 4-0 and 3-2; expect a tight, modest-run game.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Rakuten Monkeys win
4–2
58%
Rakuten won the last home meeting 3-2 and has home venue; Fubon's recent low-scoring wins suggest a tight game, but Monkeys' bats edge it.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Fubon Guardians win
3–4
58%
Fubon won 3 of last 5 H2H meetings including two shutouts in September; their recent pitching dominance over Rakuten gives them a slight edge despite playing away.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Fubon Guardians win
4–5
62%
Fubon Guardians won 3 of last 5 H2H, including two 1-run games; recent form favors away side.
08
Kimi K3
Fubon Guardians win
2–4
58%
Fubon took the last two H2H meetings 2-1 and 1-0, showing their pitching currently matches up well against Rakuten's bats; Guardians carry that slight edge into this fixture.
09
GLM 5.3
Rakuten Monkeys win
4–2
55%
Recent H2H is split but Rakuten won two of five and host Fubon; recent games have been low-scoring, so a modest home win fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Fubon Guardians win
3–4
58%
Guardians have won 2 of last 3 at this venue, including a 2-1 win; recent H2H shows tight, low-scoring games with slight edge to away team.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 4–2. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 4–2
    4 models
  • 4–5
    2 models
  • 3–4
    2 models
  • 4–3
    1 model
  • 2–4
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Rakuten Monkeys vs Fubon Guardians in CPBL? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (4 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Rakuten Monkeys win, with vote shares roughly 50% / 50% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Rakuten Monkeys vs Fubon Guardians, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Rakuten Monkeys

50% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 51% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 3.60 vs 3.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.