EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60%
MLB Sep 17, 2026 · 23:15 Finished

New York Mets
vs
Philadelphia Phillies.

Quick answer

Who will win New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies?

Final score: New York Mets 0–3 Philadelphia Phillies. Before kickoff, 10 of 10 AI models pick New York Mets to win (100%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

10 AI models read this game. The plurality on the winner leans toward New York Mets (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 5–3 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will New York Mets beat Philadelphia Phillies in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

New York Mets win 100%

10 / 10 models

Philadelphia Phillies win 0%

0 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
New York Mets win
5–4
54%
The Mets won three of the last five meetings, including two of three in Philadelphia, while the prior New York matchup was decided by one run. With no pitching details, a narrow home win is the prudent estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
New York Mets win
5–4
56%
Mets won 4 of last 5 head-to-head meetings including recent home wins, plus home-field edge; expect a close, competitive divisional contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
New York Mets win
5–3
56%
The Mets have shown strong form at home against Philadelphia, with their pitching depth often limiting the Phillies' extra-base threats at Citi Field.
04
Grok 4.6
New York Mets win
5–3
57%
Mets took 3 of last 5 H2H, including two July wins in Philadelphia. Home park in this NL East matchup supports a modest 5-3 Mets edge; September form is unknown.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
New York Mets win
4–3
58%
Mets took three of the last five meetings, including two at Philadelphia, and Citi Field gives a slight edge; Phillies keep it close after a mixed series.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
New York Mets win
5–3
58%
Mets won 3 of 5 recent H2H meetings including two at Philadelphia; home venue and September playoff push favor New York in a moderate-scoring affair.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
New York Mets win
5–3
60%
Mets 3-2 in last 5 vs Phillies, home edge, moderate scoring expected
08
Kimi K3
New York Mets win
5–4
58%
Mets have taken three of the last five meetings and get home-field edge; Phillies remain a tight divisional matchup, so expect a one-run, mid-scoring finish rather than a blowout.
09
GLM 5.3
New York Mets win
5–3
56%
Mets won three of five H2H meetings and hold home edge at Citi Field; Phillies' attack keeps it close, so a modest margin fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
New York Mets win
5–3
58%
Mets have won three of last five H2H games, including a recent 6-1 victory, and home venue adds edge; expect moderate-scoring affair.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

6 of 10 models settled on 5–3. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 5–3
    6 models
  • 5–4
    3 models
  • 4–3
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies in MLB? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (5 - 3; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is New York Mets win, with vote shares roughly 100% / 0% home and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors New York Mets

100% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
Expected runs tilt 4.90 vs 3.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live game data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.