AL- 1-0 AL- · 44% KAI 1-2 PAN · 54% AL- 1-1 ALS · 45% JUV 1-0 REN · 56% ARA 0-2 AZA · 57% DIN 1-0 NEC · 54% FER 2-0 TOR · 59% LEC 1-1 SUN · 46% OFI 0-2 BAY · 61% UNI 1-0 HAP · 54% STU 1-2 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53% AL- 1-0 AL- · 44% KAI 1-2 PAN · 54% AL- 1-1 ALS · 45% JUV 1-0 REN · 56% ARA 0-2 AZA · 57% DIN 1-0 NEC · 54% FER 2-0 TOR · 59% LEC 1-1 SUN · 46% OFI 0-2 BAY · 61% UNI 1-0 HAP · 54% STU 1-2 MAR · 48% FKC 1-2 FCC · 56% GET 1-2 FCL · 50% FCI 0-1 MJA · 53%

Is DeepSeek good at predictions?

Updated 22 October 2026

Short answer

Yes, and it is cheap. On 1,490 graded football matches DeepSeek picked the right result 49.4% of the time (Claude 51.7%, GPT 47.2%). On prediction-market questions the model closest to the market most often so far is DeepSeek V4 Pro, beating the market price on 21 of 41 resolved questions.

Football

Model Right result
DeepSeek 49.4%
Claude 51.7%
GPT 47.2%
Grok 48.7%
Gemini 49.4%

Prediction markets

Blind to the price, the AI average picked the right side 70.7% of the time against 75.6% for the market on 41 questions. Live: AI vs Polymarket and Kalshi.

Questions

Is DeepSeek better than ChatGPT at predictions?

On our football record DeepSeek 49.4% vs GPT 47.2%. Both are beaten by ten models agreeing (62.4%).

Ask 10 AIs before your next match.

Free picks for every match, every model graded, and your own questions answered by the whole council.